On 11/01/18 18:25, Oscar Mateo wrote:
From: Kelvin Gardiner <kelvin.gardiner@xxxxxxxxx>
ICL 11 has a greater number of maximum subslices. This patch
reflects this.
v2: GEN11 updates to MCR_SELECTOR (Oscar)
Bspec: 21139
BSpec: 21108
Reviewed-by: Daniele Ceraolo Spurio <daniele.ceraolospurio@xxxxxxxxx> (v1)
Signed-off-by: Kelvin Gardiner <kelvin.gardiner@xxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Oscar Mateo <oscar.mateo@xxxxxxxxx>
---
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_reg.h | 4 ++++
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_engine_cs.c | 22 ++++++++++++++++++----
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_ringbuffer.h | 2 +-
3 files changed, 23 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_reg.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_reg.h
index c9b6250..c79ca5b 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_reg.h
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_reg.h
@@ -2444,6 +2444,10 @@ enum i915_power_well_id {
#define GEN8_MCR_SLICE_MASK GEN8_MCR_SLICE(3)
#define GEN8_MCR_SUBSLICE(subslice) (((subslice) & 3) << 24)
#define GEN8_MCR_SUBSLICE_MASK GEN8_MCR_SUBSLICE(3)
+#define GEN11_MCR_SLICE(slice) (((slice) & 0xf) << 27)
+#define GEN11_MCR_SLICE_MASK GEN8_MCR_SLICE(0xf)
I think you got that line above wrong, should be GEN11_MCR_SLICE(0xf)
+#define GEN11_MCR_SUBSLICE(subslice) (((subslice) & 0x7) << 24)
+#define GEN11_MCR_SUBSLICE_MASK GEN8_MCR_SUBSLICE(0x7)
Same issue on the line above : GEN11_MCR_SUBSLICE(0x7)
Otherwise, looks good.
#define RING_IPEIR(base) _MMIO((base)+0x64)
#define RING_IPEHR(base) _MMIO((base)+0x68)
/*
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_engine_cs.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_engine_cs.c
index a373bcb..8c0da94 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_engine_cs.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_engine_cs.c
@@ -775,10 +775,24 @@ const char *i915_cache_level_str(struct drm_i915_private *i915, int type)
read_subslice_reg(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv, int slice,
int subslice, i915_reg_t reg)
{
+ uint32_t mcr_slice_subslice_mask;
+ uint32_t mcr_slice_subslice_select;
uint32_t mcr;
uint32_t ret;
enum forcewake_domains fw_domains;
+ if (INTEL_GEN(dev_priv) >= 11) {
+ mcr_slice_subslice_mask = GEN11_MCR_SLICE_MASK |
+ GEN11_MCR_SUBSLICE_MASK;
+ mcr_slice_subslice_select = GEN11_MCR_SLICE(slice) |
+ GEN11_MCR_SUBSLICE(subslice);
+ } else {
+ mcr_slice_subslice_mask = GEN8_MCR_SLICE_MASK |
+ GEN8_MCR_SUBSLICE_MASK;
+ mcr_slice_subslice_select = GEN8_MCR_SLICE(slice) |
+ GEN8_MCR_SUBSLICE(subslice);
+ }
+
fw_domains = intel_uncore_forcewake_for_reg(dev_priv, reg,
FW_REG_READ);
fw_domains |= intel_uncore_forcewake_for_reg(dev_priv,
@@ -793,14 +807,14 @@ const char *i915_cache_level_str(struct drm_i915_private *i915, int type)
* The HW expects the slice and sublice selectors to be reset to 0
* after reading out the registers.
*/
- WARN_ON_ONCE(mcr & (GEN8_MCR_SLICE_MASK | GEN8_MCR_SUBSLICE_MASK));
- mcr &= ~(GEN8_MCR_SLICE_MASK | GEN8_MCR_SUBSLICE_MASK);
- mcr |= GEN8_MCR_SLICE(slice) | GEN8_MCR_SUBSLICE(subslice);
+ WARN_ON_ONCE(mcr & mcr_slice_subslice_mask);
+ mcr &= ~mcr_slice_subslice_mask;
+ mcr |= mcr_slice_subslice_select;
I915_WRITE_FW(GEN8_MCR_SELECTOR, mcr);
ret = I915_READ_FW(reg);
- mcr &= ~(GEN8_MCR_SLICE_MASK | GEN8_MCR_SUBSLICE_MASK);
+ mcr &= ~mcr_slice_subslice_mask;
I915_WRITE_FW(GEN8_MCR_SELECTOR, mcr);
intel_uncore_forcewake_put__locked(dev_priv, fw_domains);
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_ringbuffer.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_ringbuffer.h
index 2a88231..029093a 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_ringbuffer.h
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_ringbuffer.h
@@ -82,7 +82,7 @@ enum intel_engine_hangcheck_action {
}
#define I915_MAX_SLICES 3
-#define I915_MAX_SUBSLICES 3
+#define I915_MAX_SUBSLICES 8
#define instdone_slice_mask(dev_priv__) \
(INTEL_GEN(dev_priv__) == 7 ? \
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
