Re: [PATCH 07/16] drm/i915/skl+: make sure higher latency level has higher wm value

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Regards

Shashank


On 2/6/2018 6:28 PM, Vidya Srinivas wrote:
From: Mahesh Kumar <mahesh1.kumar@xxxxxxxxx>

DDB allocation optimization algorithm requires/assumes ddb allocation for
any memory C-state level DDB value to be as high as level below.
this line / statement can be more clear, "DDB value to be as high as level below " what is level below ? are we talking about C state level or DDB level ?
Render decompression requires level WM to be as high as wm level-0.
This patch fulfils both the requirements.

Signed-off-by: Mahesh Kumar <mahesh1.kumar@xxxxxxxxx>
---
  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_pm.c | 18 ++++++++++++++++++
  1 file changed, 18 insertions(+)

diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_pm.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_pm.c
index 07fc084..d9801bf 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_pm.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_pm.c
@@ -4531,6 +4531,7 @@ static int skl_compute_plane_wm(const struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv,
  				uint16_t ddb_allocation,
  				int level,
  				const struct skl_wm_params *wp,
+				const struct skl_wm_level *result_prev,
  				struct skl_wm_level *result /* out */)
  {
  	const struct drm_plane_state *pstate = &intel_pstate->base;
@@ -4598,6 +4599,15 @@ static int skl_compute_plane_wm(const struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv,
  		} else {
  			res_blocks++;
  		}
+
+		/*
+		 * Make sure result blocks for higher latency levels are atleast
+		 * as high as level below.
what is level below ? latency level or you mean "one level below the current level" ? Please reformat this comment.
+		 * Assumption in DDB algorithm optimization for special cases.
+		 * Also covers Display WA #1125 for RC.
+		 */
+		if (result_prev->plane_res_b > res_blocks)
+			res_blocks = result_prev->plane_res_b;
  	}
if (INTEL_GEN(dev_priv) >= 11) {
@@ -4680,6 +4690,13 @@ skl_compute_wm_levels(const struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv,
  	for (level = 0; level <= max_level; level++) {
  		struct skl_wm_level *result = plane_num ? &wm->uv_wm[level] :
  							  &wm->wm[level];
+		struct skl_wm_level *result_prev;
+
+		if (level)
+			result_prev = plane_num ? &wm->uv_wm[level - 1] :
+						  &wm->wm[level - 1];
+		else
+			result_prev = plane_num ? &wm->uv_wm[0] : &wm->wm[0];
ret = skl_compute_plane_wm(dev_priv,
  					   cstate,
@@ -4687,6 +4704,7 @@ skl_compute_wm_levels(const struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv,
  					   ddb_blocks,
  					   level,
  					   wm_params,
+					   result_prev,
  					   result);
  		if (ret)
  			return ret;

_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx




[Index of Archives]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]
  Powered by Linux