Re: [PATCH 05/16] drm/i915/skl+: NV12 related changes for WM

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Regards

Shashank


On 2/6/2018 6:28 PM, Vidya Srinivas wrote:
From: Mahesh Kumar <mahesh1.kumar@xxxxxxxxx>

NV12 requires WM calculation for UV plane as well.
UV plane WM should also fulfill all the WM related restrictions.

Signed-off-by: Mahesh Kumar <mahesh1.kumar@xxxxxxxxx>
---
  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h  |  1 +
  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_drv.h |  1 +
  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_pm.c  | 54 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--------
  3 files changed, 45 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h
index cca5414..778dc5a 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h
@@ -1459,6 +1459,7 @@ struct skl_wm_level {
  struct skl_wm_params {
  	bool x_tiled, y_tiled;
  	bool rc_surface;
+	bool is_nv12;
  	uint32_t width;
  	uint8_t cpp;
  	uint32_t plane_pixel_rate;
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_drv.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_drv.h
index ed33840..65dac21 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_drv.h
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_drv.h
@@ -594,6 +594,7 @@ struct intel_pipe_wm {
struct skl_plane_wm {
  	struct skl_wm_level wm[8];
+	struct skl_wm_level uv_wm[8];
  	struct skl_wm_level trans_wm;
  	bool is_nv12;
  };
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_pm.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_pm.c
index 4c9a811..b3d1bf7 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_pm.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_pm.c
@@ -4421,7 +4421,7 @@ static int
  skl_compute_plane_wm_params(const struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv,
  			    struct intel_crtc_state *cstate,
  			    const struct intel_plane_state *intel_pstate,
-			    struct skl_wm_params *wp)
+			    struct skl_wm_params *wp, int plane_num)
Is this plane_num intended for 'no of planes' or 'plane number' ? from the usage below looks like 'no of planes' but I could be wrong.
  {
  	struct intel_plane *plane = to_intel_plane(intel_pstate->base.plane);
  	const struct drm_plane_state *pstate = &intel_pstate->base;
@@ -4434,6 +4434,12 @@ skl_compute_plane_wm_params(const struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv,
  	if (!intel_wm_plane_visible(cstate, intel_pstate))
  		return 0;
+ /* only NV12 format has two planes */
+	if (plane_num == 1 && fb->format->format != DRM_FORMAT_NV12) {
+		DRM_DEBUG_KMS("Non NV12 format have single plane\n");
+		return -EINVAL;
+	}
The comment says only NV12 format can have two planes, but if format != NV12 && plane_num == 1, why is this an error ? Also the debug message says "Non NV12 format have single plane". Shouldn't it ? Looks like you are expecting plane_number = 0, 1 for NV12 planes, and when plane_num is non-zero, you expect it to be NV12 only ?
+
  	wp->y_tiled = fb->modifier == I915_FORMAT_MOD_Y_TILED ||
  		      fb->modifier == I915_FORMAT_MOD_Yf_TILED ||
  		      fb->modifier == I915_FORMAT_MOD_Y_TILED_CCS ||
@@ -4441,6 +4447,7 @@ skl_compute_plane_wm_params(const struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv,
  	wp->x_tiled = fb->modifier == I915_FORMAT_MOD_X_TILED;
  	wp->rc_surface = fb->modifier == I915_FORMAT_MOD_Y_TILED_CCS ||
  			 fb->modifier == I915_FORMAT_MOD_Yf_TILED_CCS;
+	wp->is_nv12 = fb->format->format == DRM_FORMAT_NV12;
if (plane->id == PLANE_CURSOR) {
  		wp->width = intel_pstate->base.crtc_w;
@@ -4453,7 +4460,10 @@ skl_compute_plane_wm_params(const struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv,
  		wp->width = drm_rect_width(&intel_pstate->base.src) >> 16;
  	}
- wp->cpp = fb->format->cpp[0];
+	if (plane_num == 1 && wp->is_nv12)
+		wp->width /= 2;
+
+	wp->cpp = fb->format->cpp[plane_num];
  	wp->plane_pixel_rate = skl_adjusted_plane_pixel_rate(cstate,
  							     intel_pstate);
@@ -4649,7 +4659,8 @@ skl_compute_wm_levels(const struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv,
  		      struct intel_crtc_state *cstate,
  		      const struct intel_plane_state *intel_pstate,
  		      const struct skl_wm_params *wm_params,
-		      struct skl_plane_wm *wm)
+		      struct skl_plane_wm *wm,
+		      int plane_num)
Same question here
  {
  	struct intel_crtc *intel_crtc = to_intel_crtc(cstate->base.crtc);
  	struct drm_plane *plane = intel_pstate->base.plane;
@@ -4657,15 +4668,20 @@ skl_compute_wm_levels(const struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv,
  	uint16_t ddb_blocks;
  	enum pipe pipe = intel_crtc->pipe;
  	int level, max_level = ilk_wm_max_level(dev_priv);
+	enum plane_id plane_id = intel_plane->id;
  	int ret;
if (WARN_ON(!intel_pstate->base.fb))
  		return -EINVAL;
- ddb_blocks = skl_ddb_entry_size(&ddb->plane[pipe][intel_plane->id]);
+	if (plane_num == 0)
+		ddb_blocks = skl_ddb_entry_size(&ddb->plane[pipe][plane_id]);
+	else
+		ddb_blocks = skl_ddb_entry_size(&ddb->uv_plane[pipe][plane_id]);
for (level = 0; level <= max_level; level++) {
-		struct skl_wm_level *result = &wm->wm[level];
+		struct skl_wm_level *result = plane_num ? &wm->uv_wm[level] :
+							  &wm->wm[level];
It would look neat if both above condition as well as this one follows the same pattern, if() else() Or (cond)? () : ().
ret = skl_compute_plane_wm(dev_priv,
  					   cstate,
@@ -4680,9 +4696,6 @@ skl_compute_wm_levels(const struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv,
  			return ret;
  	}
- if (intel_pstate->base.fb->format->format == DRM_FORMAT_NV12)
-		wm->is_nv12 = true;
-
  	return 0;
  }
@@ -4791,20 +4804,39 @@ static int skl_build_pipe_wm(struct intel_crtc_state *cstate, wm = &pipe_wm->planes[plane_id];
  		ddb_blocks = skl_ddb_entry_size(&ddb->plane[pipe][plane_id]);
-		memset(&wm_params, 0, sizeof(struct skl_wm_params));
ret = skl_compute_plane_wm_params(dev_priv, cstate,
-						  intel_pstate, &wm_params);
+						  intel_pstate, &wm_params, 0);
This is confusing that you refer to 0 as plane_num = 1 and 1 as plane_num = 2.
  		if (ret)
  			return ret;
ret = skl_compute_wm_levels(dev_priv, ddb, cstate,
-					    intel_pstate, &wm_params, wm);
+					    intel_pstate, &wm_params, wm, 0);
  		if (ret)
  			return ret;
+
  		skl_compute_transition_wm(cstate, &wm_params, &wm->wm[0],
  					  ddb_blocks, &wm->trans_wm);
+
+		/* uv plane watermarks must also be validated for NV12 */
+		if (wm_params.is_nv12) {
+			memset(&wm_params, 0, sizeof(struct skl_wm_params));
+			wm->is_nv12 = true;
+
+			ret = skl_compute_plane_wm_params(dev_priv, cstate,
+							  intel_pstate,
+							  &wm_params, 1);
Same here, there should be a better way to do this.

- Shashank
+			if (ret)
+				return ret;
+
+			ret = skl_compute_wm_levels(dev_priv, ddb, cstate,
+						    intel_pstate, &wm_params,
+						    wm, 1);
+			if (ret)
+				return ret;
+		}
  	}
+
  	pipe_wm->linetime = skl_compute_linetime_wm(cstate);
return 0;

_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx




[Index of Archives]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]
  Powered by Linux