On 06/02/2018 09:46, Chris Wilson wrote:
When a request is preempted, it is unsubmitted from the HW queue and
removed from the active list of breadcrumbs. In the process, this
however triggers the signaler and it may see the clear rbtree with the
old, and still valid, seqno. This confuses the signaler into action and
signaling the fence.
Fixes: d6a2289d9d6b ("drm/i915: Remove the preempted request from the execution queue")
Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Joonas Lahtinen <joonas.lahtinen@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: <stable@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> # v4.12+
---
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_breadcrumbs.c | 20 ++++----------------
1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 16 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_breadcrumbs.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_breadcrumbs.c
index efbc627a2a25..b955f7d7bd0f 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_breadcrumbs.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_breadcrumbs.c
@@ -588,29 +588,16 @@ void intel_engine_remove_wait(struct intel_engine_cs *engine,
spin_unlock_irq(&b->rb_lock);
}
-static bool signal_valid(const struct drm_i915_gem_request *request)
-{
- return intel_wait_check_request(&request->signaling.wait, request);
-}
-
static bool signal_complete(const struct drm_i915_gem_request *request)
{
if (!request)
return false;
- /* If another process served as the bottom-half it may have already
- * signalled that this wait is already completed.
- */
- if (intel_wait_complete(&request->signaling.wait))
- return signal_valid(request);
Okay so this can return true for unsubmitted requests since rb node will
be empty and global_seqno == wait.seqno == 0.
I just panic when thinking about races and ordering, since these checks
used to run unlocked. So even better that they are gone.
-
- /* Carefully check if the request is complete, giving time for the
+ /*
+ * Carefully check if the request is complete, giving time for the
* seqno to be visible or if the GPU hung.
*/
- if (__i915_request_irq_complete(request))
- return true;
-
- return false;
+ return __i915_request_irq_complete(request); > }
static struct drm_i915_gem_request *to_signaler(struct rb_node *rb)
@@ -712,6 +699,7 @@ static int intel_breadcrumbs_signaler(void *arg)
&request->fence.flags)) {
local_bh_disable();
dma_fence_signal(&request->fence);
+ GEM_BUG_ON(!i915_gem_request_completed(request));
local_bh_enable(); /* kick start the tasklets */
}
Looks OK. But I can't say it's straightforward to understand it.
Reviewed-by: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@xxxxxxxxx>
Regards,
Tvrtko
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
