On 01/31/2018 11:38 PM, Chris Wilson wrote:
Quoting Jackie Li (2018-01-19 01:29:28)
GuC related exported functions should start with "intel_guc_"
prefix and pass intel_guc as the first parameter since its guc
related. Current guc_ggtt_offset() failed to follow this code
convention.
But it was not, and still does not operate on the guc. Is that changing?
this problem is that it's guc related and the following patches do need
to access the data from intel_guc. Do you think it's getting better
if I add a sentence like "the future patches will need to access
the intel_guc to verify the offset"?
Regards,
-Jackie
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
