During testing, we trigger a lot of resets on an unbannable context
leading to massive amounts of irrelevant debug spam. Remove the
ban_score accounting and message for the unbannable context so that we
improve the signal:noise in the log messages for when the unexpected
occurs.
Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Mika Kuoppala <mika.kuoppala@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
---
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem.c | 23 +++++++++++------------
1 file changed, 11 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem.c
index 63308ec016a3..088579324c14 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem.c
@@ -2823,24 +2823,23 @@ i915_gem_object_pwrite_gtt(struct drm_i915_gem_object *obj,
return 0;
}
-static bool ban_context(const struct i915_gem_context *ctx,
- unsigned int score)
-{
- return (i915_gem_context_is_bannable(ctx) &&
- score >= CONTEXT_SCORE_BAN_THRESHOLD);
-}
-
static void i915_gem_context_mark_guilty(struct i915_gem_context *ctx)
{
- unsigned int score;
bool banned;
atomic_inc(&ctx->guilty_count);
- score = atomic_add_return(CONTEXT_SCORE_GUILTY, &ctx->ban_score);
- banned = ban_context(ctx, score);
- DRM_DEBUG_DRIVER("context %s marked guilty (score %d) banned? %s\n",
- ctx->name, score, yesno(banned));
+ banned = false;
+ if (i915_gem_context_is_bannable(ctx)) {
+ unsigned int score;
+
+ score = atomic_add_return(CONTEXT_SCORE_GUILTY,
+ &ctx->ban_score);
+ banned = score >= CONTEXT_SCORE_BAN_THRESHOLD;
+
+ DRM_DEBUG_DRIVER("context %s marked guilty (score %d) banned? %s\n",
+ ctx->name, score, yesno(banned));
+ }
if (!banned)
return;
--
2.15.1
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
