On Fri, Jan 26, 2018 at 06:49:20PM -0800, Dhinakaran Pandiyan wrote:
> The core already takes care of the delay before retrying. The delay now
> changes to (500, 600)us instead of (500 + 1000, 600 + 1500)us.
Reviewed-by: David Weinehall <david.weinehall@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Cc: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@xxxxxxxxx>
> Signed-off-by: Dhinakaran Pandiyan <dhinakaran.pandiyan@xxxxxxxxx>
> ---
> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dp.c | 8 --------
> 1 file changed, 8 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dp.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dp.c
> index 2454326690fb..97a4557053db 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dp.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dp.c
> @@ -1189,14 +1189,6 @@ intel_dp_aux_ch(struct intel_dp *intel_dp,
> if (recv_bytes == 0 || recv_bytes > 20) {
> DRM_DEBUG_KMS("Forbidden recv_bytes = %d on aux transaction\n",
> recv_bytes);
> - /*
> - * FIXME: This patch was created on top of a series that
> - * organize the retries at drm level. There EBUSY should
> - * also take care for 1ms wait before retrying.
> - * That aux retries re-org is still needed and after that is
> - * merged we remove this sleep from here.
> - */
> - usleep_range(1000, 1500);
> ret = -EBUSY;
> goto out;
> }
> --
> 2.14.1
>
> _______________________________________________
> Intel-gfx mailing list
> Intel-gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
