Quoting Matthew Auld (2018-01-29 10:54:35) > On 29 January 2018 at 10:28, Chris Wilson <chris@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > Older gcc is complaining it can't follow the guards and thinks that > > addr may be used uninitialised > > > > In the process, we can simplify down to one loop, > > add/remove: 0/0 grow/shrink: 0/1 up/down: 0/-131 (-131) > > Function old new delta > > setup_scratch_page 545 414 -131 > > > > Reported-by: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > > Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > > Cc: Matthew Auld <matthew.auld@xxxxxxxxx> > > With or without __GFP_RETRY_MAYFAIL: Snuck it in. > Reviewed-by: Matthew Auld <matthew.auld@xxxxxxxxx> Ta, pushed. Remind me in 6 months (4.17) to see if we're finally clean. -Chris _______________________________________________ Intel-gfx mailing list Intel-gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
