On 27/01/18 12:28, Chris Wilson wrote:
If we remove some hardcoded assumptions about the preempt context having
a fixed id, reserved from use by normal user contexts, we may only
allocate the i915_gem_context when required. Then the subsequent
decisions on using preemption reduce to having the preempt context
available.
Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Michal Winiarski <michal.winiarski@xxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@xxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Arkadiusz Hiler <arkadiusz.hiler@xxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Mika Kuoppala <mika.kuoppala@xxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Daniele Ceraolo Spurio <daniele.ceraolospurio@xxxxxxxxx>
---
Acked-by: Daniele Ceraolo Spurio <daniele.ceraolospurio@xxxxxxxxx>
I didn't spot anything wrong with the patch, but I'll leave the full
review to the preemption experts ;)
Thanks,
Daniele
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
