Re: [PATCH] drm/i915: Assert the engine has finished the seqno on unsubmission

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



s/has/has not/

Quoting Chris Wilson (2018-01-29 09:49:12)
> Assert that we do not try to unsubmit a completed request, as should we
> try to resubmit it later, the ring is already past the request's
> breadcrumb and the breadcrumb will not be updated.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
>  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem_request.c | 2 ++
>  1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem_request.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem_request.c
> index 9b02310307fc..7192521e3d10 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem_request.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem_request.c
> @@ -652,6 +652,8 @@ void __i915_gem_request_unsubmit(struct drm_i915_gem_request *request)
>          */
>         GEM_BUG_ON(!request->global_seqno);
>         GEM_BUG_ON(request->global_seqno != engine->timeline->seqno);
> +       GEM_BUG_ON(i915_seqno_passed(intel_engine_get_seqno(engine),
> +                                    request->global_seqno));
>         engine->timeline->seqno--;
>  
>         /* We may be recursing from the signal callback of another i915 fence */
> -- 
> 2.15.1
> 
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx




[Index of Archives]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]
  Powered by Linux