Quoting David Weinehall (2018-01-26 15:53:53)
> On Fri, Jan 26, 2018 at 04:48:05PM +0200, Jani Nikula wrote:
> > Currently pch_id gets assigned also when there's no pch. It doesn't look
> > like it makes a difference, but do the right thing anyway.
>
> Makes sense.
>
> Reviewed-by: David Weinehall <david.weinehall@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
I suspect this is the one that upset gvt.
> > Signed-off-by: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@xxxxxxxxx>
> > ---
> > drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.c | 4 ++--
> > 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.c
> > index 3e8664de025d..0332e315650c 100644
> > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.c
> > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.c
> > @@ -183,8 +183,6 @@ static void intel_detect_pch(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv)
> >
> > id = pch->device & INTEL_PCH_DEVICE_ID_MASK;
> >
> > - dev_priv->pch_id = id;
> > -
> > if (id == INTEL_PCH_IBX_DEVICE_ID_TYPE) {
> > dev_priv->pch_type = PCH_IBX;
> > DRM_DEBUG_KMS("Found Ibex Peak PCH\n");
> > @@ -272,6 +270,8 @@ static void intel_detect_pch(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv)
> > continue;
> > }
> >
> > + dev_priv->pch_id = id;
> > +
> > break;
> > }
> > if (!pch)
> > --
> > 2.11.0
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Intel-gfx mailing list
> > Intel-gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> > https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
> _______________________________________________
> Intel-gfx mailing list
> Intel-gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
