On Tue, Jan 23, 2018 at 05:05:33PM -0200, Paulo Zanoni wrote:
> From: Mahesh Kumar <mahesh1.kumar@xxxxxxxxx>
>
> Gen11/ICL onward ddb entry start/end mask is increased from 10 bits to
> 11 bits. This patch make changes to use proper mask for ICL+ during
> hardware ddb value readout.
>
> Signed-off-by: Mahesh Kumar <mahesh1.kumar@xxxxxxxxx>
> ---
> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_pm.c | 18 ++++++++++++++----
> 1 file changed, 14 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_pm.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_pm.c
> index d4cd631377da..84a5b13fdee2 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_pm.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_pm.c
> @@ -3860,10 +3860,18 @@ static unsigned int skl_cursor_allocation(int num_active)
> return 8;
> }
>
> -static void skl_ddb_entry_init_from_hw(struct skl_ddb_entry *entry, u32 reg)
> +static void skl_ddb_entry_init_from_hw(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv,
> + struct skl_ddb_entry *entry, u32 reg)
> {
> - entry->start = reg & 0x3ff;
> - entry->end = (reg >> 16) & 0x3ff;
> + uint16_t mask;
> +
> + if (INTEL_GEN(dev_priv) >= 11)
> + mask = 0x7ff;
> + else
> + mask = 0x3ff;
> + entry->start = reg & mask;
> + entry->end = (reg >> 16) & mask;
Should these be turned in to _MASK and _SHIFT defines?
> +
> if (entry->end)
> entry->end += 1;
> }
> @@ -3894,7 +3902,9 @@ void skl_ddb_get_hw_state(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv,
> else
> val = I915_READ(CUR_BUF_CFG(pipe));
>
> - skl_ddb_entry_init_from_hw(&ddb->plane[pipe][plane_id], val);
> + skl_ddb_entry_init_from_hw(dev_priv,
> + &ddb->plane[pipe][plane_id],
> + val);
> }
>
> intel_display_power_put(dev_priv, power_domain);
> --
> 2.14.3
>
> _______________________________________________
> Intel-gfx mailing list
> Intel-gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
