On Tue, Jan 23, 2018 at 09:11:23PM +0000, Chris Wilson wrote:
> Quoting Ville Syrjala (2018-01-23 18:33:43)
> > From: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> >
> > Replace the ad-hoc plane indexing scheme used by the frontbuffer
> > tracking with enum plane_id.
> >
> > The old video overlay not being part of the plane_id namespace
> > will just be given the high bit.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > ---
> > drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h | 11 +++--------
> > drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c | 4 ++--
> > drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_fbc.c | 2 +-
> > drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_sprite.c | 4 +++-
> > 4 files changed, 9 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h
> > index 8333692dac5a..bd545b1c9546 100644
> > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h
> > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h
> > @@ -2404,16 +2404,11 @@ enum hdmi_force_audio {
> > *
> > * We have one bit per pipe and per scanout plane type.
> > */
> > -#define INTEL_MAX_SPRITE_BITS_PER_PIPE 5
> > #define INTEL_FRONTBUFFER_BITS_PER_PIPE 8
>
> I would feel safer with a BUILD_BUG_ON to catch plane_id overflowing
> INTEL_FRONTBUFFER_BITS_PER_PIPE (-1 for the overlay reservation).
Actaully we'll be going past that BITS_PER_PIPE-1 limit real soon
now, but the BITS_PER_PIPE will be sufficient for some time I think.
So I think I'd just rather ignore the overlap between the plane_id
and the overlay because that's not going happen on actual hardware.
But I think asserting that BITS_PER_PIPE is sufficient is a good idea.
Just need to figure out where to put it. There's no init function
or anything like that in the frontbuffer tracking code, so that's
not going to work. I guess one option would be to include the
assert in the INTEL_FRONTBUFFER() macro itself.
>
> > -#define INTEL_FRONTBUFFER_PRIMARY(pipe) \
> > - (1 << (INTEL_FRONTBUFFER_BITS_PER_PIPE * (pipe)))
> > -#define INTEL_FRONTBUFFER_CURSOR(pipe) \
> > - (1 << (1 + (INTEL_FRONTBUFFER_BITS_PER_PIPE * (pipe))))
> > -#define INTEL_FRONTBUFFER_SPRITE(pipe, plane) \
> > - (1 << (2 + plane + (INTEL_FRONTBUFFER_BITS_PER_PIPE * (pipe))))
> > +#define INTEL_FRONTBUFFER(pipe, plane_id) \
> > + (1 << ((plane_id) + INTEL_FRONTBUFFER_BITS_PER_PIPE * (pipe)))
> > #define INTEL_FRONTBUFFER_OVERLAY(pipe) \
> > - (1 << (2 + INTEL_MAX_SPRITE_BITS_PER_PIPE + (INTEL_FRONTBUFFER_BITS_PER_PIPE * (pipe))))
> > + (1 << (INTEL_FRONTBUFFER_BITS_PER_PIPE - 1 + INTEL_FRONTBUFFER_BITS_PER_PIPE * (pipe)))
> > #define INTEL_FRONTBUFFER_ALL_MASK(pipe) \
> > (0xff << (INTEL_FRONTBUFFER_BITS_PER_PIPE * (pipe)))
>
> The conversion looks straightforward nevertheless, and indeed no reason
> to have move than one indexing id for a plane.
> Reviewed-by: Chris Wilson <chris@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> -Chris
--
Ville Syrjälä
Intel OTC
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
