Quoting Michal Wajdeczko (2018-01-23 16:44:33) > On Tue, 23 Jan 2018 16:42:17 +0100, Sagar Arun Kamble > > @@ -605,7 +681,11 @@ int i915_guc_log_control(struct drm_i915_private > > *dev_priv, u64 control_val) > > } > > /* GuC logging is currently the only user of Guc2Host interrupts */ > > + mutex_lock(&dev_priv->drm.struct_mutex); > > + intel_runtime_pm_get(dev_priv); > > gen9_enable_guc_interrupts(dev_priv); > > + intel_runtime_pm_put(dev_priv); > > + mutex_unlock(&dev_priv->drm.struct_mutex); > > Maybe pm_get/lock/xxx/unlock/pm_put would be better order ? There's no strong reason to prefer one nesting or the other. So pick a pattern for guc_interrupts and stick to it :) -Chris _______________________________________________ Intel-gfx mailing list Intel-gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
