Re: [PATCH 2/4] drm/i915/guc: Grab RPM wakelock while disabling GuC interrupts

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 





On 1/22/2018 3:41 PM, Chris Wilson wrote:
Quoting Sagar Arun Kamble (2018-01-22 08:26:02)
Disabling GuC interrupts involves access to GuC IRQ control registers
hence ensure device is RPM awake.

v2: Add comment about need to synchronize flush work and log runtime
     destroy

v3: Moved patch earlier in the series and removed comment about future
work. (Tvrtko)

v4-v5: Rebase.

Signed-off-by: Sagar Arun Kamble <sagar.a.kamble@xxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Michal Wajdeczko <michal.wajdeczko@xxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Daniele Ceraolo Spurio <daniele.ceraolospurio@xxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@xxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Chris Wilson <chris@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Joonas Lahtinen <joonas.lahtinen@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
---
  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_guc_log.c | 3 +++
  1 file changed, 3 insertions(+)

diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_guc_log.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_guc_log.c
index 9e5600355..4039912 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_guc_log.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_guc_log.c
@@ -694,7 +694,10 @@ void i915_guc_log_unregister(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv)
mutex_lock(&dev_priv->drm.struct_mutex);
         /* GuC logging is currently the only user of Guc2Host interrupts */
+       intel_runtime_pm_get(dev_priv);
         gen9_disable_guc_interrupts(dev_priv);
Do we have/want assert_rpm_wakelock_held() in
gen9_disable_guc_interrupts() ?
We don't have. Will add it.
Are we really locking the interrupts on/off with struct_mutex?
Yes.
-Chris
Thanks,
Sagar
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx




[Index of Archives]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]
  Powered by Linux