Quoting Michel Dänzer (2018-01-22 09:50:38) > On 2018-01-20 11:40 AM, Chris Wilson wrote: > > > > Along this vein, it's worthwhile pointing out that the current scheduler > > is not even close to being the cgroup-enabled CFS implementation it > > needs to be to call itself a scheduler. (It's more or less a no-op > > scheduler.) It may be premature to start exposing hooks into it. > > Sounds like it may not be too late to abandon the separate i915 > scheduler in favour of the common one used by amdgpu and etnaviv? Why? It doesn't do anything of the sort either. It has a lot of code to achieve less. -Chris _______________________________________________ Intel-gfx mailing list Intel-gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
