Re: [PATCH 2/2] drm/i915/execlists: Skip forcewake for ELSP submission

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 




On 20/01/2018 09:31, Chris Wilson wrote:
Now that we can read the CSB from the HWSP, we may avoid having to
perform mmio reads entirely and so forgo the rigmarole of the forcewake
dance.

Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
---
  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_lrc.c | 12 +++++++++---
  1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_lrc.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_lrc.c
index ff25f209d0a5..7d2df72e68d3 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_lrc.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_lrc.c
@@ -778,6 +778,7 @@ static void execlists_submission_tasklet(unsigned long data)
  	struct intel_engine_execlists * const execlists = &engine->execlists;
  	struct execlist_port * const port = execlists->port;
  	struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv = engine->i915;
+	bool fw = false;
/* We can skip acquiring intel_runtime_pm_get() here as it was taken
  	 * on our behalf by the request (see i915_gem_mark_busy()) and it will
@@ -788,8 +789,6 @@ static void execlists_submission_tasklet(unsigned long data)
  	 */
  	GEM_BUG_ON(!dev_priv->gt.awake);
- intel_uncore_forcewake_get(dev_priv, execlists->fw_domains);
-
  	/* Prefer doing test_and_clear_bit() as a two stage operation to avoid
  	 * imposing the cost of a locked atomic transaction when submitting a
  	 * new request (outside of the context-switch interrupt).
@@ -818,6 +817,12 @@ static void execlists_submission_tasklet(unsigned long data)
  		 */
  		__clear_bit(ENGINE_IRQ_EXECLIST, &engine->irq_posted);
  		if (unlikely(execlists->csb_head == -1)) { /* following a reset */
+			if (!fw) {
+				intel_uncore_forcewake_get(dev_priv,
+							   execlists->fw_domains);
+				fw = true;
+			}
+
  			head = readl(dev_priv->regs + i915_mmio_reg_offset(RING_CONTEXT_STATUS_PTR(engine)));
  			tail = GEN8_CSB_WRITE_PTR(head);
  			head = GEN8_CSB_READ_PTR(head);

There's a GEM_TRACE which does a readl a line below, outside the if.

Then there's a writel down lower, under "if (head != execlists->csb_head)".

@@ -943,7 +948,8 @@ static void execlists_submission_tasklet(unsigned long data)
  	if (!execlists_is_active(execlists, EXECLISTS_ACTIVE_PREEMPT))
  		execlists_dequeue(engine);
- intel_uncore_forcewake_put(dev_priv, execlists->fw_domains);
+	if (fw)
+		intel_uncore_forcewake_put(dev_priv, execlists->fw_domains);
  }
static void insert_request(struct intel_engine_cs *engine,


I had a similar patch, which also did some other tweaks, some of which I think you recently also sent. So I support it in principle.

Regards,

Tvrtko

_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx




[Index of Archives]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]
  Powered by Linux