Quoting Paulo Zanoni (2018-01-19 18:10:51) > Em Sex, 2018-01-19 às 17:30 +0000, Tvrtko Ursulin escreveu: > > On 10/01/2018 10:16, Joonas Lahtinen wrote: > > > If these are in a later patch, should be squashed here. > > > > It might be possible in some cases, or it might be quite challenging > > in > > others. Need to look into it but no promises. We might have to live > > with > > having place holders like this in the code which get removed by > > later > > patches/series. It's quite complex logistically to organise multiple > > series, written by multiple authors, at different times, and make it > > look 100% pretty. (And not just squash and butcher everything up at > > merge time.) > > I agree with Tvrtko here and in the other points above. If we take > Joonas's point to the extreme, ICL enabling would be a single giant > patch. We have to accept that some things are going to be incomplete in > the series that enable a platform. We also have the alpha_support > option to protect us here, and CI to make sure ICL's incompleteness > doesn't affect the other platforms. Later in this series is a patch which fixes a bug in this patch. That certainly needs to be addressed. ;) -Chris _______________________________________________ Intel-gfx mailing list Intel-gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
