On 18/01/2018 13:04, Chris Wilson wrote:
Quoting Tvrtko Ursulin (2018-01-18 12:46:55)
On 17/01/2018 15:39, Lionel Landwerlin wrote:
+
+ if (query_item->length == 0)
+ return total_length;
+
+ if (query_item->length < total_length)
+ return -EINVAL;
Did we talk about whether this check should be != or < yet? != would
sound safer to me, or you want to allow extending the queries in the
future and keeping the same id?
This is me, because I like read(buf, len) style behaviour that lets me
pass in a preallocated buffer that should be big enough without having
to worry and do a 2-pass approach to find out the length of the buffer
to allocate first. '!=' style I have found much more painful to handle in
userspace.
Yeah that's fine by me. Doesn't preclude kernel returning you some new
fields you don't know about either.
Regards,
Tvrtko
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
