On Tue, 2018-01-09 at 10:38 +0100, Maarten Lankhorst wrote:
> Op 08-01-18 om 20:59 schreef Pandiyan, Dhinakaran:
> > On Thu, 2018-01-04 at 18:08 -0800, Rodrigo Vivi wrote:
<snip>
> >> I will probably have more comments later, but just doing a brain dump now
> >> since I end up forgetting to write yesterday...
> >>
> >> The approach here in general is good and much better than that pre,post hooks.
> >> But I just believe we can do this here in a more generic approach than deviating
> >> the initial power well and domains.
> > I would have liked a generic approach (for display_power_{get,put}), but
> > I think this case is special enough that making it stand out is better.
> Agreed, I can think of no other way myself without making the generic case too complicated. The whole runtime power management became way too complex for a special case.
>
I found out that DMC keeps the hardware out of DC5/6 when vblank
interrupts are enabled. This simplified the solution a lot
(https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/series/36435/) Thanks for your review
on this series, would appreciate any feedback on the new one too :)
-DK
> ~Maarten
> _______________________________________________
> Intel-gfx mailing list
> Intel-gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
