Re: [PATCH v2] drm/i915: Use the engine name directly in the error_state file

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 




On 10/01/2018 01:21, Michel Thierry wrote:
Instead of using local string names that we will have to keep
maintaining, use the engine->name directly.

v2: Better invalid engine_id handling, capture_bo will not be able know
the engine_id and end up with -1 (Michal).

Suggested-by: Michal Wajdeczko <michal.wajdeczko@xxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Michel Thierry <michel.thierry@xxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Michal Wajdeczko <michal.wajdeczko@xxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Chris Wilson <chris@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
---
  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gpu_error.c | 33 ++++++++++++++++++++-------------
  1 file changed, 20 insertions(+), 13 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gpu_error.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gpu_error.c
index 94499c24f279..422e302161e5 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gpu_error.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gpu_error.c
@@ -34,16 +34,22 @@
#include "i915_drv.h" -static const char *engine_str(int engine)
-{
-	switch (engine) {
-	case RCS: return "render";
-	case VCS: return "bsd";
-	case BCS: return "blt";
-	case VECS: return "vebox";
-	case VCS2: return "bsd2";
-	default: return "";
-	}
+static inline const char *intel_engine_name(struct intel_engine_cs *engine)
+{
+	return engine ? engine->name : "";
+}
+
+static inline struct intel_engine_cs *
+intel_engine_lookup(struct drm_i915_private *i915, int engine_id)
+{
+	if (engine_id < 0 || engine_id >= I915_NUM_ENGINES)
+		return NULL;
+	return i915->engine[engine_id];
+}
+
+static const char *engine_str(struct drm_i915_private *i915, int engine_id)
+{
+	return intel_engine_name(intel_engine_lookup(i915, engine_id));
  }

Feels like a bit of an overkill to have three functions to this trivial thing but meh. Could also maybe cheat and have engine_id as unsigned int and so would only need to check for >= I915_NUM_ENGINES.

Anyway, I peeked in intel_error_decode source and couldn't spot anything that looked it would break. You checked it by running it? Assuming you did:

Reviewed-by: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@xxxxxxxxx>

Regards,

Tvrtko

static const char *tiling_flag(int tiling)
@@ -345,7 +351,7 @@ static void print_error_buffers(struct drm_i915_error_state_buf *m,
  		err_puts(m, purgeable_flag(err->purgeable));
  		err_puts(m, err->userptr ? " userptr" : "");
  		err_puts(m, err->engine != -1 ? " " : "");
-		err_puts(m, engine_str(err->engine));
+		err_puts(m, engine_str(m->i915, err->engine));
  		err_puts(m, i915_cache_level_str(m->i915, err->cache_level));
if (err->name)
@@ -417,7 +423,8 @@ static void error_print_engine(struct drm_i915_error_state_buf *m,
  {
  	int n;
- err_printf(m, "%s command stream:\n", engine_str(ee->engine_id));
+	err_printf(m, "%s command stream:\n", engine_str(m->i915,
+							 ee->engine_id));
  	err_printf(m, "  IDLE?: %s\n", yesno(ee->idle));
  	err_printf(m, "  START: 0x%08x\n", ee->start);
  	err_printf(m, "  HEAD:  0x%08x [0x%08x]\n", ee->head, ee->rq_head);
@@ -633,7 +640,7 @@ int i915_error_state_to_str(struct drm_i915_error_state_buf *m,
  		if (error->engine[i].hangcheck_stalled &&
  		    error->engine[i].context.pid) {
  			err_printf(m, "Active process (on ring %s): %s [%d], score %d\n",
-				   engine_str(i),
+				   engine_str(m->i915, i),
  				   error->engine[i].context.comm,
  				   error->engine[i].context.pid,
  				   error->engine[i].context.ban_score);

_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx




[Index of Archives]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]
  Powered by Linux