Quoting Chris Wilson (2018-01-15 10:15:45) > Quoting Tvrtko Ursulin (2018-01-15 10:08:01) > > If it compiles, and works, assuming we have tests cases which exercise > > both paths, then it is obviously fine. > > The no-timeout variants are using for inter-engine signaling, the > timeout variant for external fences and KMS. Yes, both are covered, > though only the no-timeout variants are really stressed to see how > timeouts are handled (i.e. GPU hang and reset). The actual timeout > fences are only stressed in a token effort, and hard to distinguish from > the multiple similar timeout mechanisms spread around the code. I really need to beef up the sw-fence/dma-fence interop selftests. -Chris _______________________________________________ Intel-gfx mailing list Intel-gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
