Re: [PATCH 2/6] drm/i915/debugfs: reuse max slice/subslices already stored in sseu

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 




On 18/12/2017 15:35, Lionel Landwerlin wrote:
Now that we have that information in topology fields, let's just reused it.

Signed-off-by: Lionel Landwerlin <lionel.g.landwerlin@xxxxxxxxx>
---
  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_debugfs.c | 26 ++++++++++----------------
  1 file changed, 10 insertions(+), 16 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_debugfs.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_debugfs.c
index 0c7890b695c5..6ec7543e698f 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_debugfs.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_debugfs.c
@@ -4308,11 +4308,11 @@ static void gen10_sseu_device_status(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv,
  				     struct sseu_dev_info *sseu)
  {
  	const struct intel_device_info *info = INTEL_INFO(dev_priv);
-	int s_max = 6, ss_max = 4;
  	int s, ss;
-	u32 s_reg[s_max], eu_reg[2 * s_max], eu_mask[2];
+	u32 s_reg[info->sseu.max_slices],
+		eu_reg[2 * info->sseu.max_subslices], eu_mask[2];

This is a bit unusual style, perhaps split into separate declarations.

- for (s = 0; s < s_max; s++) {
+	for (s = 0; s < info->sseu.max_slices; s++) {
  		/*
  		 * FIXME: Valid SS Mask respects the spec and read
  		 * only valid bits for those registers, excluding reserverd
@@ -4334,7 +4334,7 @@ static void gen10_sseu_device_status(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv,
  		     GEN9_PGCTL_SSB_EU210_ACK |
  		     GEN9_PGCTL_SSB_EU311_ACK;
- for (s = 0; s < s_max; s++) {
+	for (s = 0; s < info->sseu.max_slices; s++) {
  		if ((s_reg[s] & GEN9_PGCTL_SLICE_ACK) == 0)
  			/* skip disabled slice */
  			continue;
@@ -4342,7 +4342,7 @@ static void gen10_sseu_device_status(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv,
  		sseu->slice_mask |= BIT(s);
  		sseu->subslices_mask[s] = info->sseu.subslices_mask[s];
- for (ss = 0; ss < ss_max; ss++) {
+		for (ss = 0; ss < info->sseu.max_subslices; ss++) {
  			unsigned int eu_cnt;
if (!(s_reg[s] & (GEN9_PGCTL_SS_ACK(ss))))
@@ -4362,17 +4362,11 @@ static void gen10_sseu_device_status(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv,
  static void gen9_sseu_device_status(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv,
  				    struct sseu_dev_info *sseu)
  {
-	int s_max = 3, ss_max = 4;
+	const struct intel_device_info *info = INTEL_INFO(dev_priv);
  	int s, ss;
-	u32 s_reg[s_max], eu_reg[2*s_max], eu_mask[2];
-
-	/* BXT has a single slice and at most 3 subslices. */
-	if (IS_GEN9_LP(dev_priv)) {
-		s_max = 1;
-		ss_max = 3;
-	}
+	u32 s_reg[info->sseu.max_slices], eu_reg[2*info->sseu.max_subslices], eu_mask[2];

Spaces around operators are preferred.

- for (s = 0; s < s_max; s++) {
+	for (s = 0; s < info->sseu.max_slices; s++) {
  		s_reg[s] = I915_READ(GEN9_SLICE_PGCTL_ACK(s));
  		eu_reg[2*s] = I915_READ(GEN9_SS01_EU_PGCTL_ACK(s));
  		eu_reg[2*s + 1] = I915_READ(GEN9_SS23_EU_PGCTL_ACK(s));
@@ -4387,7 +4381,7 @@ static void gen9_sseu_device_status(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv,
  		     GEN9_PGCTL_SSB_EU210_ACK |
  		     GEN9_PGCTL_SSB_EU311_ACK;
- for (s = 0; s < s_max; s++) {
+	for (s = 0; s < info->sseu.max_slices; s++) {
  		if ((s_reg[s] & GEN9_PGCTL_SLICE_ACK) == 0)
  			/* skip disabled slice */
  			continue;
@@ -4398,7 +4392,7 @@ static void gen9_sseu_device_status(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv,
  			sseu->subslices_mask[s] =
  				INTEL_INFO(dev_priv)->sseu.subslices_mask[s];
- for (ss = 0; ss < ss_max; ss++) {
+		for (ss = 0; ss < info->sseu.max_subslices; ss++) {
  			unsigned int eu_cnt;
if (IS_GEN9_LP(dev_priv)) {


With the formatting tweaks,

Reviewed-by: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@xxxxxxxxx>

Regards,

Tvrtko
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx




[Index of Archives]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]
  Powered by Linux