On Thu, 11 Jan 2018 06:52:18 +0100, Sagar Arun Kamble
<sagar.a.kamble@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On 1/10/2018 9:35 PM, Michal Wajdeczko wrote:
We used value -1 to indicate "disabled" and values 0..3 to
indicate "enabled", but most of our other modparams are using
-1 for "auto" mode and 0 for "disable". For consistency let's
change our log level values to:
-1: auto (depends on USES_GUC and DRM_I915_DEBUG)
"depends on HAS_GUC, USES_GUC, DRM_I915_DEBUG and DRM_I915_DEBUG_GEM"
I should write "(depends on platform and Kconfig.debug settings)" as
actual condition may change in the near feature.
s/intel_uc_is_using_guc()/USES_GUC
seeing some more intel_uc_is_using_* instead of macro usage USES_*
It was by design, as in intel_uc_sanitize_options() function we are
using only HAS_xxx macros and instead of USES_xxx we call intel_uc_is_xxx
helpers directly.
0: disabled
1: enabled (severity level 0 = min)
2: enabled (severity level 1)
3: enabled (severity level 2)
4: enabled (severity level 3 = max)
Signed-off-by: Michal Wajdeczko <michal.wajdeczko@xxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Sagar Arun Kamble <sagar.a.kamble@xxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Daniele Ceraolo Spurio <daniele.ceraolospurio@xxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@xxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Joonas Lahtinen <joonas.lahtinen@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Chris Wilson <chris@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
---
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_params.c | 3 ++-
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_guc.c | 21 ++++++++++-----
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_guc_log.c | 47
++++++++++++++++-----------------
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_uc.c | 51
++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--
4 files changed, 87 insertions(+), 35 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_params.c
b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_params.c
index b5f3eb4..0b553a8 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_params.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_params.c
@@ -155,7 +155,8 @@ struct i915_params i915_modparams __read_mostly = {
"(-1=auto, 0=disable [default], 1=GuC submission, 2=HuC load)");
i915_param_named(guc_log_level, int, 0400,
- "GuC firmware logging level (-1:disabled (default), 0-3:enabled)");
+ "GuC firmware logging level. Requires GuC to be loaded. "
+ "(-1=auto [default], 0=disable, 1..4=enable with verbosity
min..max)");
i915_param_named_unsafe(guc_firmware_path, charp, 0400,
"GuC firmware path to use instead of the default one");
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_guc.c
b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_guc.c
index 50b4725..2227236 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_guc.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_guc.c
@@ -215,6 +215,18 @@ static u32 get_core_family(struct drm_i915_private
*dev_priv)
}
}
+static u32 get_log_verbosity_flags(void)
+{
making this inline would be good i guess.
No need to do so. Compiler will take care of it as needed (as this
function is already marked as static)
+ if (i915_modparams.guc_log_level > 0) {
+ u32 verbosity = i915_modparams.guc_log_level - 1;
+
+ GEM_BUG_ON(verbosity > GUC_LOG_VERBOSITY_MAX);
+ return verbosity << GUC_LOG_VERBOSITY_SHIFT;
+ }
+ GEM_BUG_ON(i915_modparams.enable_guc < 0);
+ return GUC_LOG_DISABLED;
+}
+
/*
* Initialise the GuC parameter block before starting the firmware
* transfer. These parameters are read by the firmware on startup
@@ -247,12 +259,7 @@ void intel_guc_init_params(struct intel_guc *guc)
params[GUC_CTL_LOG_PARAMS] = guc->log.flags;
- if (i915_modparams.guc_log_level >= 0) {
- params[GUC_CTL_DEBUG] =
- i915_modparams.guc_log_level << GUC_LOG_VERBOSITY_SHIFT;
- } else {
- params[GUC_CTL_DEBUG] = GUC_LOG_DISABLED;
- }
+ params[GUC_CTL_DEBUG] = get_log_verbosity_flags();
/* If GuC submission is enabled, set up additional parameters here
*/
if (USES_GUC_SUBMISSION(dev_priv)) {
@@ -445,7 +452,7 @@ int intel_guc_resume(struct drm_i915_private
*dev_priv)
if (guc->fw.load_status != INTEL_UC_FIRMWARE_SUCCESS)
return 0;
- if (i915_modparams.guc_log_level >= 0)
+ if (i915_modparams.guc_log_level > 0)
if (i915_modparams.guc_log_level)
gen9_enable_guc_interrupts(dev_priv);
data[0] = INTEL_GUC_ACTION_EXIT_S_STATE;
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_guc_log.c
b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_guc_log.c
index eaedd63..e6d59bf 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_guc_log.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_guc_log.c
<snip>
@@ -582,7 +578,7 @@ int i915_guc_log_control(struct drm_i915_private
*dev_priv, u64 control_val)
return -EINVAL;
/* This combination doesn't make sense & won't have any effect */
- if (!log_param.logging_enabled && (i915_modparams.guc_log_level < 0))
+ if (!log_param.logging_enabled && !i915_modparams.guc_log_level)
return 0;
ret = guc_log_control(guc, log_param.value);
@@ -592,11 +588,12 @@ int i915_guc_log_control(struct drm_i915_private
*dev_priv, u64 control_val)
}
if (log_param.logging_enabled) {
- i915_modparams.guc_log_level = log_param.verbosity;
+ i915_modparams.guc_log_level = 1 + log_param.verbosity;
reading the log level from i915_guc_log_control_get debugfs should
decrement guc_log_level by 1.
That's the other story.
If I read our code right, we were using different format for get:
(0=level 0, 1=level 1, ... 3=level 3)
and set:
(0=disabled, 1=enabled level 0, 9=enabled level 1, 11=enabled level 2...
I think we can change that to use always (0, 1..4) and hide internal
layout of the GuC command from the user.
- /* If log_level was set as -1 at boot time, then the relay channel
file
- * wouldn't have been created by now and interrupts also would not
have
- * been enabled. Try again now, just in case.
+ /*
+ * If log was disabled at boot time, then the relay channel file
+ * wouldn't have been created by now and interrupts also would
+ * not have been enabled. Try again now, just in case.
*/
ret = guc_log_late_setup(guc);
if (ret < 0) {
@@ -607,7 +604,8 @@ int i915_guc_log_control(struct drm_i915_private
*dev_priv, u64 control_val)
/* GuC logging is currently the only user of Guc2Host interrupts */
gen9_enable_guc_interrupts(dev_priv);
} else {
- /* Once logging is disabled, GuC won't generate logs & send an
+ /*
+ * Once logging is disabled, GuC won't generate logs & send an
* interrupt. But there could be some data in the log buffer
* which is yet to be captured. So request GuC to update the log
* buffer state and then collect the left over logs.
@@ -615,7 +613,7 @@ int i915_guc_log_control(struct drm_i915_private
*dev_priv, u64 control_val)
guc_flush_logs(guc);
/* As logging is disabled, update log level to reflect that */
- i915_modparams.guc_log_level = -1;
+ i915_modparams.guc_log_level = 0;
}
return ret;
@@ -623,8 +621,7 @@ int i915_guc_log_control(struct drm_i915_private
*dev_priv, u64 control_val)
void i915_guc_log_register(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv)
{
- if (!USES_GUC_SUBMISSION(dev_priv) ||
- (i915_modparams.guc_log_level < 0))
+ if (!USES_GUC_SUBMISSION(dev_priv) || !i915_modparams.guc_log_level)
return;
mutex_lock(&dev_priv->drm.struct_mutex);
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_uc.c
b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_uc.c
index d82ca0f..fd39c06 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_uc.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_uc.c
@@ -65,6 +65,21 @@ static int __get_platform_enable_guc(struct
drm_i915_private *dev_priv)
return enable_guc;
}
+static int __get_default_guc_log_level(struct drm_i915_private
*dev_priv)
+{
+ int guc_log_level = 0; /* disabled */
+
+ /* Enable if we're running on platform with GuC and debug config */
+ if (HAS_GUC(dev_priv) && intel_uc_is_using_guc() &&
+ (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_DRM_I915_DEBUG) ||
+ IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_DRM_I915_DEBUG_GEM)))
+ guc_log_level = 1 + GUC_LOG_VERBOSITY_MAX;
+
+ /* Any platform specific fine-tuning can be done here */
+
+ return guc_log_level;
+}
+
/**
* intel_uc_sanitize_options - sanitize uC related modparam options
* @dev_priv: device private
@@ -74,6 +89,13 @@ static int __get_platform_enable_guc(struct
drm_i915_private *dev_priv)
* modparam varies between platforms and it is hardcoded in driver
code.
* Any other modparam value is only monitored against availability of
the
* related hardware or firmware definitions.
+ *
+ * In case of "guc_log_level" option this function will attempt to
modify
+ * it only if it was initially set to "auto(-1)" or if initial value
was
+ * "enable(1..4)" on platforms without the GuC. Default value for this
+ * modparam varies between platforms and is usually set to "disable(0)"
+ * unless GuC is enabled on given platform and the driver is compiled
with
+ * debug config when this modparam will default to "enable(1..4)".
*/
void intel_uc_sanitize_options(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv)
{
@@ -105,8 +127,33 @@ void intel_uc_sanitize_options(struct
drm_i915_private *dev_priv)
"no HuC firmware");
}
+ /* A negative value means "use platform/config default" */
+ if (i915_modparams.guc_log_level < 0)
+ i915_modparams.guc_log_level =
+ __get_default_guc_log_level(dev_priv);
+
+ DRM_DEBUG_DRIVER("guc_log_level=%d (enabled:%s verbosity:%d)\n",
+ i915_modparams.guc_log_level,
+ yesno(i915_modparams.guc_log_level > 0),
+ i915_modparams.guc_log_level - 1);
+
I think this DRM_DEBUG_DRIVER should be moved after all sanitization.
Yes. I copied that from above enable_guc sanitization but forget that
in above code there is no override :)
+ if (i915_modparams.guc_log_level > 0 && !intel_uc_is_using_guc()) {
+ DRM_WARN("Incompatible option ignored: guc_log_level=%d, %s!\n",
+ i915_modparams.guc_log_level,
+ !HAS_GUC(dev_priv) ? "no GuC hardware" :
+ "GuC not enabled");
+ i915_modparams.guc_log_level = 0;
+ }
+
+ if (i915_modparams.guc_log_level > 1 + GUC_LOG_VERBOSITY_MAX) {
+ DRM_WARN("Incompatible option ignored: guc_log_level=%d, %s!\n",
"Incompatible option overridden"? as we are letting this through with
max verbosity which I think is not ignoring :)
sure
+ i915_modparams.guc_log_level, "verbosity too high");
+ i915_modparams.guc_log_level = 1 + GUC_LOG_VERBOSITY_MAX;
+ }
+
/* Make sure that sanitization was done */
GEM_BUG_ON(i915_modparams.enable_guc < 0);
+ GEM_BUG_ON(i915_modparams.guc_log_level < 0);
}
void intel_uc_init_early(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv)
@@ -152,7 +199,7 @@ void intel_uc_init_mmio(struct drm_i915_private
*dev_priv)
static void guc_capture_load_err_log(struct intel_guc *guc)
{
- if (!guc->log.vma || i915_modparams.guc_log_level < 0)
+ if (!guc->log.vma || !i915_modparams.guc_log_level)
return;
if (!guc->load_err_log)
@@ -322,7 +369,7 @@ int intel_uc_init_hw(struct drm_i915_private
*dev_priv)
}
if (USES_GUC_SUBMISSION(dev_priv)) {
- if (i915_modparams.guc_log_level >= 0)
+ if (i915_modparams.guc_log_level)
gen9_enable_guc_interrupts(dev_priv);
ret = intel_guc_submission_enable(guc);
Thanks
Sagar
Thanks,
Michal
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx