> -----Original Message----- > From: Latvala, Petri > Sent: Thursday, January 4, 2018 2:11 PM > To: Lofstedt, Marta <marta.lofstedt@xxxxxxxxx> > Cc: intel-gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > Subject: Re: [PATCH i-g-t] test/kms_psr_sink_crc - Hack to test > test_cleanup(&data) for psr_basic > > On Thu, Jan 04, 2018 at 12:54:34PM +0200, Marta Lofstedt wrote: > > The "*ERROR* Potential atomic update failure on pipe A" > > started to occure on some BAT machines with IGT_4063. > > Looking at the dmesgs the ERROR print come when the subtest is > > exiting. So, this is just a longshot to test if we may need to do the > > cleanup on this subtest as well. > > > > Bugzilla: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=104260 > > > > Signed-off-by: Marta Lofstedt <marta.lofstedt@xxxxxxxxx> > > --- > > tests/kms_psr_sink_crc.c | 1 + > > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+) > > > > diff --git a/tests/kms_psr_sink_crc.c b/tests/kms_psr_sink_crc.c index > > 83a69f0b..7ee4c2f4 100644 > > --- a/tests/kms_psr_sink_crc.c > > +++ b/tests/kms_psr_sink_crc.c > > @@ -532,6 +532,7 @@ int main(int argc, char *argv[]) > > igt_subtest("psr_basic") { > > setup_test_plane(&data); > > igt_assert(wait_psr_entry(&data)); > > + test_cleanup(&data); > > } > > > This looks correct indeed. > > > > > > igt_subtest("psr_drrs") { > > > But the same is required here, isn't it? Probably, but it is green on GLK-shards which is the only machine currently running it. By the way it's the only green PSR related tests on GLK-shards... I guess I could do a fastfeedback.testlist hack to BAT to see if it fails there on some machine. > > > > -- > Petri Latvala _______________________________________________ Intel-gfx mailing list Intel-gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
