We should never insert the invalid seqno into the wait tree, so assert we do not. Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> --- drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_breadcrumbs.c | 2 ++ 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+) diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_breadcrumbs.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_breadcrumbs.c index 6cfffa68f71a..bb985bfc279c 100644 --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_breadcrumbs.c +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_breadcrumbs.c @@ -396,6 +396,8 @@ static bool __intel_engine_add_wait(struct intel_engine_cs *engine, bool first, armed; u32 seqno; + GEM_BUG_ON(!wait->seqno); + /* Insert the request into the retirement ordered list * of waiters by walking the rbtree. If we are the oldest * seqno in the tree (the first to be retired), then -- 2.15.1 _______________________________________________ Intel-gfx mailing list Intel-gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
