On 12/7/2017 1:25 AM, Lionel Landwerlin wrote:
On 15/11/17 12:13, Sagar Arun Kamble wrote:
From: Sourab Gupta <sourab.gupta@xxxxxxxxx>
The OA reports contain the least significant 32 bits of the gpu
timestamp.
This patch enables retrieval of the timestamp field from OA reports, to
forward as 64 bit raw gpu timestamps in the perf samples.
v2: Rebase w.r.t new timecounter support.
Signed-off-by: Sourab Gupta <sourab.gupta@xxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Sagar Arun Kamble <sagar.a.kamble@xxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Lionel Landwerlin <lionel.g.landwerlin@xxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Chris Wilson <chris@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Sourab Gupta <sourab.gupta@xxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Matthew Auld <matthew.auld@xxxxxxxxx>
---
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h | 2 ++
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_perf.c | 26 +++++++++++++++++++++++++-
2 files changed, 27 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h
b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h
index e08bc85..5534cd2 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h
@@ -2151,6 +2151,8 @@ struct i915_perf_stream {
*/
struct i915_oa_config *oa_config;
+ u64 last_gpu_ts;
+
/**
* System time correlation variables.
*/
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_perf.c
b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_perf.c
index f7e748c..3b721d7 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_perf.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_perf.c
@@ -575,6 +575,26 @@ static int append_oa_status(struct
i915_perf_stream *stream,
}
/**
+ * get_gpu_ts_from_oa_report - Retrieve absolute gpu timestamp from
OA report
+ *
+ * Note: We are assuming that we're updating last_gpu_ts frequently
enough so
+ * that it's never possible to see multiple overflows before we compare
+ * sample_ts to last_gpu_ts. Since this is significantly large duration
+ * (~6min for 80ns ts base), we can safely assume so.
+ */
+static u64 get_gpu_ts_from_oa_report(struct i915_perf_stream *stream,
+ const u8 *report)
+{
+ u32 sample_ts = *(u32 *)(report + 4);
+ u32 delta;
+
+ delta = sample_ts - (u32)stream->last_gpu_ts;
+ stream->last_gpu_ts += delta;
+
+ return stream->last_gpu_ts;
+}
+
+/**
* append_oa_sample - Copies single OA report into userspace read()
buffer.
* @stream: An i915-perf stream opened for OA metrics
* @buf: destination buffer given by userspace
@@ -622,7 +642,9 @@ static int append_oa_sample(struct
i915_perf_stream *stream,
}
if (sample_flags & SAMPLE_GPU_TS) {
- /* Timestamp to be populated from OA report */
+ /* Timestamp populated from OA report */
+ gpu_ts = get_gpu_ts_from_oa_report(stream, report);
+
if (copy_to_user(buf, &gpu_ts, I915_PERF_TS_SAMPLE_SIZE))
return -EFAULT;
}
I think everything above this line should be merged int patch 2.
It's better to have a single functional patch.
Yes. Will merge.
@@ -2421,6 +2443,8 @@ static u64 i915_cyclecounter_read(const struct
cyclecounter *cc)
GEN7_TIMESTAMP_UDW);
intel_runtime_pm_put(dev_priv);
+ stream->last_gpu_ts = ts_count;
This doesn't look right. You're already adding a delta in
get_gpu_ts_from_oa_report().
This will produce incorrect timestamps. Since at the moment we won't
allow opening without PROP_SAMPLE_OA, I would just drop this line.
Yes. makes sense. will remove.
+
return ts_count;
}
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx