Re: [PATCH i-g-t 3/3] tests/perf_pmu: Verify engine busyness accuracy

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 




On 19/12/2017 22:45, Chris Wilson wrote:
Quoting Tvrtko Ursulin (2017-12-19 15:45:43)
+static void debug_error(const char *str, double val, double ref)
+{
+       igt_debug("%s=%.2f%% (%.2f/%.2f)\n", str, __error(val, ref), val, ref);
+}
+
+static void log_error(const char *str, double val, double ref)
+{
+       debug_error(str, val, ref);
+       igt_info("%s=%.2f%%\n", str, __error(val, ref));
+}

Looking at the CI output, these could really do with some explanation.

Yes a very disappointing think to look at in the morning. Much worse than the previous version which used calibrated batches. While at the same time new version is much better on my SKL..

Regards,

Tvrtko
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx




[Index of Archives]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]
  Powered by Linux