Quoting Lionel Landwerlin (2017-12-18 12:12:47) > Let's make the order of the fields of the tracepoints involving gem > request match across i915. This makes userspace processing of > tracepoint a bit easier. > > Suggested-by: Chris Wilson <chris@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > Signed-off-by: Lionel Landwerlin <lionel.g.landwerlin@xxxxxxxxx> We could argue for days upon the preferred ordering of ctx/ring/seqno, but I think the best compromise is indeed hw_id/ring/ctx/seqno. I couldn't see any remaining inconsistencies, Reviewed-by: Chris Wilson <chris@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> -Chris _______________________________________________ Intel-gfx mailing list Intel-gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
