Re: [PATCH i-g-t 2/4] tests: Move gem_bad_address to hw-tests

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 





On 13/12/17 05:26, Chris Wilson wrote:
Quoting Petri Latvala (2017-12-13 12:58:14)
Since the test is considered to be HW focused, meaning that it doesn't
really exercise the driver but rather an HW feature, it is placed in
tests/hw-tests.

Do we really want to keep this test at all? It's an interesting debate

This test has been around for a long time now so I think keeping it around would not be a problem, plus it actually gets fixed in this series.

-Antonio

whether we want to show how trivial it is to subvert the kernel and HW
(in some circumstances). > -Chris
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx

_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx




[Index of Archives]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]
  Powered by Linux