Re: [PATCH 5/5] drm/doc: Move legacy kms helpers to the very end

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Thu, Dec 14, 2017 at 09:11:01PM -0500, Alex Deucher wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 14, 2017 at 3:30 PM, Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@xxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > diff --git a/Documentation/gpu/drm-kms.rst b/Documentation/gpu/drm-kms.rst
> > index 420025bd6a9b..cbba93483aec 100644
> > --- a/Documentation/gpu/drm-kms.rst
> > +++ b/Documentation/gpu/drm-kms.rst
> > @@ -263,10 +263,10 @@ Taken all together there's two consequences for the atomic design:
> >
> >  - An atomic update is assembled and validated as an entirely free-standing pile
> >    of structures within the :c:type:`drm_atomic_state <drm_atomic_state>`
> > -  container. Again drivers can subclass that container for their own state
> > -  structure tracking needs. Only when a state is committed is it applied to the
> > -  driver and modeset objects. This way rolling back an update boils down to
> > -  releasing memory and unreferencing objects like framebuffers.
> > +  container. Driver private state structures are also tracked in the same
> > +  structure, see the next chapter.  Only when a state is committed is it applied
> 
> I think it would be clearer as:
> structure (see the next chapter).
> or
> structure; see the next chapter.
> 
> Either way:
> Reviewed-by: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@xxxxxxx>

Thanks for all the review from you and DK, all taken into account and
merged.
-Daniel
-- 
Daniel Vetter
Software Engineer, Intel Corporation
http://blog.ffwll.ch
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx




[Index of Archives]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]
  Powered by Linux