[PATCH 3/3] drm/i915: Ratelimit request allocation under oom

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



If we fail to allocate a request, we can reap the outstanding requests
and push them to the request's slab's freelist before trying again. This
forces us to ratelimit malicious clients that tie up all of the system
resources in requests, instead of causing a system-wide oom.

Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Joonas Lahtinen <joonas.lahtinen@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
---
 drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem_request.c | 19 +++++++++++++++----
 1 file changed, 15 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem_request.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem_request.c
index 4d5e2b714382..59f023bb7015 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem_request.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem_request.c
@@ -677,10 +677,21 @@ i915_gem_request_alloc(struct intel_engine_cs *engine,
 	 *
 	 * Do not use kmem_cache_zalloc() here!
 	 */
-	req = kmem_cache_alloc(dev_priv->requests, GFP_KERNEL);
-	if (!req) {
-		ret = -ENOMEM;
-		goto err_unreserve;
+	req = kmem_cache_alloc(dev_priv->requests,
+			       GFP_KERNEL | __GFP_RETRY_MAYFAIL | __GFP_NOWARN);
+	if (unlikely(!req)) {
+		/* Ratelimit ourselves to prevent oom from malicious clients */
+		ret = i915_gem_wait_for_idle(dev_priv,
+					     I915_WAIT_LOCKED |
+					     I915_WAIT_INTERRUPTIBLE);
+		if (ret)
+			goto err_unreserve;
+
+		req = kmem_cache_alloc(dev_priv->requests, GFP_KERNEL);
+		if (!req) {
+			ret = -ENOMEM;
+			goto err_unreserve;
+		}
 	}
 
 	req->timeline = i915_gem_context_lookup_timeline(ctx, engine);
-- 
2.15.1

_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx




[Index of Archives]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]
  Powered by Linux