On 08/12/17 13:54, Lionel Landwerlin wrote:
On 08/12/17 13:50, Matthew Auld wrote:
On 8 December 2017 at 11:39, Lionel Landwerlin
<lionel.g.landwerlin@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
This will enable running the tests on Cannonlake.
Signed-off-by: Lionel Landwerlin <lionel.g.landwerlin@xxxxxxxxx>
Missing the CS timestamp frequency fallback for CNL in
get_cs_timestamp_frequency().
The point is that if we can't read it from the kernel, the tests
better fail.
It seems like 50% of the parts I've seen so far are clocked like BXT
and the other 50% like SKL/KBL.
The tests will fail if we run with the wrong assumed frequency.
Actually I probably want to replace that assert with a skip!
Otherwise:
Reviewed-by: Matthew Auld <matthew.auld@xxxxxxxxx>
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
