On Wed, Dec 06, 2017 at 09:52:51AM +0100, Maarten Lankhorst wrote: > Op 01-12-17 om 14:32 schreef Ville Syrjälä: > > On Thu, Nov 30, 2017 at 04:18:53PM +0100, Maarten Lankhorst wrote: > >> Normally this is called on a modeset, but the call is missing when > >> we inherit the mode from the BIOS, so make sure it's called somewhere > >> in hardware readout. > >> > >> Signed-off-by: Maarten Lankhorst <maarten.lankhorst@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > >> --- > >> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c | 2 ++ > >> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+) > >> > >> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c > >> index cd60b4d5cd9d..26edae07e006 100644 > >> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c > >> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c > >> @@ -14843,6 +14843,8 @@ static void intel_sanitize_encoder(struct intel_encoder *encoder) > >> > >> connector->base.dpms = DRM_MODE_DPMS_OFF; > >> connector->base.encoder = NULL; > >> + } else if (connector) { > >> + intel_opregion_notify_encoder(encoder, true); > > > > We should probably also do intel_opregion_notify_encoder(encoder, false) > > when intel_sanitize_encoder() disables the encoder. > Would it be terrible to always call intel_opregion_notify_encoder, with true or false depending on need? Sounds like a reasonable approach to me. But it's hard to say what the correct thing is since this is all some form of BIOS magic. -- Ville Syrjälä Intel OTC _______________________________________________ Intel-gfx mailing list Intel-gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx