On Sat, 2017-12-02 at 08:47 +0000, Chris Wilson wrote: > In CI, we were observing situations where the busy blt would complete > before the very next instruction (in userspace) to assert that it was > busy. This is entirely possible if the process was scheduled away and > slept for longer than the arbitrary batch. Instead replace arbitrariness > with a precise infinity. > > v2: Be respectful to UP! > v3: Move spinbatch to owning process to avoid serialisation delays. > > Bugzilla: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=103829 > Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Even the variable names were good. Reviewed-by: Joonas Lahtinen <joonas.lahtinen@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Regards, Joonas -- Joonas Lahtinen Open Source Technology Center Intel Corporation _______________________________________________ Intel-gfx mailing list Intel-gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
