Quoting Chris Wilson (2017-12-01 17:55:15) > Quoting Sean Paul (2017-12-01 17:48:17) > > On Fri, Dec 1, 2017 at 12:44 PM, Chris Wilson <chris@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > The current wait_for() is a little more complicated nowadays (variable > > > W). > > > > > > > Hmm, am I based off the wrong tree? I'm using drm-intel-next. > > drm-intel-next is what was sent as a PR; drm-intel-next-queued is always > current. To be sure CI, doesn't complain about merge conflicts, base on > drm-tip. Speaking of CI, do you have any instructions on how we might set up a test system? Just needs a compatible monitor and some test code? Could chamelium or something like that be used as a validator? -Chris _______________________________________________ Intel-gfx mailing list Intel-gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
