On Tue, 28 Nov 2017 11:41:57 +0100, Sagar Arun Kamble
<sagar.a.kamble@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On 11/28/2017 1:24 AM, Sujaritha Sundaresan wrote:
We currently have two module parameters that control GuC:
"enable_guc_loading" and "enable_guc_submission". Whenever
we need submission=1, we also need loading=1.We also need
loading=1 when we want to want to verify the HuC, which
is every time we have a HuC (but all platforms with HuC
have a GuC and viceversa).
<SNIP>
+
+ /* Making sure that our auto is well defined */
+ GEM_BUG_ON(auto_enable_guc < 0);
+ GEM_BUG_ON((auto_enable_guc > 0) && !HAS_GUC_FW(dev_priv));
+ GEM_BUG_ON((auto_enable_guc & 2) && !HAS_HUC_FW(dev_priv));
+
+ if (i915_modparams.enable_guc < 0)
+ i915_modparams.enable_guc = auto_enable_guc;
+
+ if (i915_modparams.enable_guc > 0) {
+ if (!HAS_GUC(dev_priv) || !HAS_GUC_FW(dev_priv)) {
+ DRM_INFO("Ignoring option enable_guc=%d - %s\n",
+ i915_modparams.enable_guc,
+ !HAS_GUC(dev_priv) ? "no GuC hardware" :
+ "no GuC firmware");
+ i915_modparams.enable_guc = 0;
+ }
}
- /* A negative value means "use platform default" */
- if (i915_modparams.enable_guc_loading < 0)
- i915_modparams.enable_guc_loading = HAS_GUC_UCODE(dev_priv);
-
- /* Verify firmware version */
- if (i915_modparams.enable_guc_loading) {
- if (HAS_HUC_UCODE(dev_priv))
- intel_huc_select_fw(&dev_priv->huc);
-
- if (intel_guc_fw_select(&dev_priv->guc))
- i915_modparams.enable_guc_loading = 0;
+ if (i915_modparams.enable_guc & 2) {
+ if (!HAS_HUC_FW(dev_priv)) {
+ DRM_INFO("Ignoring option enable_guc=%d - %s\n",
+ i915_modparams.enable_guc, "no HuC firmware");
+ i915_modparams.enable_guc = 0;
Clearing only HuC status from enable_guc would be proper I guess. Sorry
I did not see this earlier.
My understanding is that if user had specified non-zero positive value of
'enable_guc' then it means that he requests *all* GuC options to be
available
(something like our old '2=required' mode). If any of required option is
not
available then we should not try to cherry-pick/drop single option.
Note that if user don't care about specific option, then user should use
-1(auto)
mode and rely on driver decision what is available and in which
configuration.
And for 'auto' mode we try to make sure to do not select broken
configurations.
Michal
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
