On Sat, 2017-11-25 at 00:48 +0100, Thomas Gleixner wrote: > On Fri, 24 Nov 2017, Matthew Auld wrote: > > > From: Joonas Lahtinen <joonas.lahtinen@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > > Please CC the linux kernel mailinglist on patches related to x86. The > MAINTAINERS file says: > > X86 ARCHITECTURE (32-BIT AND 64-BIT) > M: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> > M: Ingo Molnar <mingo@xxxxxxxxxx> > M: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@xxxxxxxxx> > M: x86@xxxxxxxxxx > L: linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx <=========== > > See also Documentation/process/submitting-patches.rst, chapter: > > 5) Select the recipients for your patch My bad. I lazily copied over the Cc: list from the patch that was meant to squashed into this patch. > > In preparation for upcoming SKUs, allow more freedom in placement > > of the Intel graphics stolen memory by BIOS to full 64bit range. > > This is not really informative for people not familiar with the issue you > want to solve. "To give upcoming SKU BIOSes more flexibility in placing the Intel graphics stolen memory, make all variables storing the placement or size compatible with full 64 bit range." Does that sound better to you? Regards, Joonas -- Joonas Lahtinen Open Source Technology Center Intel Corporation _______________________________________________ Intel-gfx mailing list Intel-gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
