On Fri, 2017-11-24 at 08:35 +0100, Ingo Molnar wrote: > * Joonas Lahtinen <joonas.lahtinen@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > In preparation for upcoming SKUs, allow more freedom in placement > > of the Intel graphics stolen memory by BIOS to full 64bit range. > > > > Signed-off-by: Joonas Lahtinen <joonas.lahtinen@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > > Cc: Matthew Auld <matthew.auld@xxxxxxxxx> > > Cc: Chris Wilson <chris@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > > Cc: Paulo Zanoni <paulo.r.zanoni@xxxxxxxxx> > > Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@xxxxxxxxxx> > > Cc: H. Peter Anvin <hpa@xxxxxxxxx> > > Cc: x86@xxxxxxxxxx > > --- > > arch/x86/kernel/early-quirks.c | 75 +++++++++++++++++++++--------------------- > > 1 file changed, 38 insertions(+), 37 deletions(-) > > So I'm wondering how this interacts with: > > drm/i915: export the stolen region as a resource I replied in the other mail thread. My suggestion is to squash the early-quirks portion of that other patch here for a clean split, then we can iterate purely on the i915 as necessary. Sorry for confusion :) Regards, Joonas -- Joonas Lahtinen Open Source Technology Center Intel Corporation _______________________________________________ Intel-gfx mailing list Intel-gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
