Quoting Tvrtko Ursulin (2017-11-23 12:34:32) > From: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@xxxxxxxxx> > > We do two things, both of which are purely to simplify and clarify the > implementation: > > 1. > > Simplify the CPU online callback so it is more obvious that the purpose > there is to set a single CPU mask bit for the first CPU which comes > online. Using cpumask_weight for this reads more obvious than the trick > with cpumask_and_any. > > 2. > > Modify the event init so that events can be created only on a single CPU. > > This removes looking at the requested CPU thread siblings, and only allows > creating on the current active CPU. > > Signed-off-by: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@xxxxxxxxx> > Cc: Chris Wilson <chris@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > Cc: Dmitry Rogozhkin <dmitry.v.rogozhkin@xxxxxxxxx> Works for me. Tested-by: Chris Wilson <chris@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> As much as I understand this (which is not a lot!), Reviewed-by: Chris Wilson <chris@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> -Chris _______________________________________________ Intel-gfx mailing list Intel-gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
