Hi Ville, On Monday, 20 November 2017 21:36:46 EET Ville Syrjälä wrote: > On Mon, Nov 20, 2017 at 09:32:56AM -0800, Sinclair Yeh wrote: > > On Mon, Nov 20, 2017 at 08:34:50AM +0100, Daniel Vetter wrote: > >> On Fri, Nov 10, 2017 at 11:42:59PM +0200, Ville Syrjälä wrote: > >>> On Fri, Nov 10, 2017 at 01:26:47PM -0800, Sinclair Yeh wrote: > >>> > Sorry this took so long. > >>> > >>> No worries. > >>> > >>>> The vmwgfx part: Reviewed-by: Sinclair Yeh <syeh@xxxxxxxxxx> > >>>> > >>>> I've done some testing and the vmwgfx part looks good. Has Daniel > >>>> already taken these or should I put them in my next request? > >>> > >>> You can take them, or I can push them to drm-misc-next. Whatever > >>> works best for you. > >>> > >>> And I'll want to revisit this topic soonish and move the clip > >>> handling into the helper as discussed with Daniel. But that can > >>> wait a bit until we get this round merged somewhere. > >> > >> Because we're still in the merge window I think it's probably best if we > >> push the entire series in through drm-misc. Tree-coordination in the > >> merge window is always a bit a pain. > > > > Ok, so I'll leave this series to you then. > > All right. Series pushed to drm-misc-next. Thanks for the reviews. And I now realize my review comments aren't very useful (apart possibly the one about adding a comment to the drm_plane_helper_check_update() function, feel free to submit a patch for that if you think it's useful) as the series has been merged already :-/ I should really start reading mails in the reverse chronological order. -- Regards, Laurent Pinchart _______________________________________________ Intel-gfx mailing list Intel-gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
