Op 17-11-17 om 16:52 schreef Ville Syrjälä: > On Fri, Nov 17, 2017 at 04:37:54PM +0100, Maarten Lankhorst wrote: >> ips_enabled was used as a variable of whether IPS can be enabled or not, >> but should be used to test whether IPS is actually enabled. >> >> Signed-off-by: Maarten Lankhorst <maarten.lankhorst@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> >> --- >> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c | 75 ++++++++++++++++------------------- >> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_pipe_crc.c | 2 - >> 2 files changed, 35 insertions(+), 42 deletions(-) >> >> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c >> index 3b3dec1e6640..8283e80597bd 100644 >> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c >> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c >> @@ -4870,7 +4870,7 @@ void hsw_enable_ips(const struct intel_crtc_state *crtc_state) >> struct drm_device *dev = crtc->base.dev; >> struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv = to_i915(dev); >> >> - if (!crtc->config->ips_enabled) >> + if (!crtc_state->ips_enabled) >> return; >> >> /* >> @@ -4966,14 +4966,6 @@ intel_post_enable_primary(struct drm_crtc *crtc, >> struct intel_crtc *intel_crtc = to_intel_crtc(crtc); >> int pipe = intel_crtc->pipe; >> >> - /* >> - * FIXME IPS should be fine as long as one plane is >> - * enabled, but in practice it seems to have problems >> - * when going from primary only to sprite only and vice >> - * versa. >> - */ >> - hsw_enable_ips(new_crtc_state); >> - >> /* >> * Gen2 reports pipe underruns whenever all planes are disabled. >> * So don't enable underrun reporting before at least some planes >> @@ -4989,10 +4981,9 @@ intel_post_enable_primary(struct drm_crtc *crtc, >> intel_check_pch_fifo_underruns(dev_priv); >> } >> >> -/* FIXME move all this to pre_plane_update() with proper state tracking */ >> +/* FIXME get rid of this and use pre_plane_update */ >> static void >> -intel_pre_disable_primary(struct drm_crtc *crtc, >> - const struct intel_crtc_state *old_crtc_state) >> +intel_pre_disable_primary_noatomic(struct drm_crtc *crtc) >> { >> struct drm_device *dev = crtc->dev; >> struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv = to_i915(dev); >> @@ -5001,32 +4992,12 @@ intel_pre_disable_primary(struct drm_crtc *crtc, >> >> /* >> * Gen2 reports pipe underruns whenever all planes are disabled. >> - * So diasble underrun reporting before all the planes get disabled. >> - * FIXME: Need to fix the logic to work when we turn off all planes >> - * but leave the pipe running. >> + * So disable underrun reporting before all the planes get disabled. >> */ >> if (IS_GEN2(dev_priv)) >> intel_set_cpu_fifo_underrun_reporting(dev_priv, pipe, false); >> >> - /* >> - * FIXME IPS should be fine as long as one plane is >> - * enabled, but in practice it seems to have problems >> - * when going from primary only to sprite only and vice >> - * versa. >> - */ >> - hsw_disable_ips(old_crtc_state); >> -} >> - >> -/* FIXME get rid of this and use pre_plane_update */ >> -static void >> -intel_pre_disable_primary_noatomic(struct drm_crtc *crtc) >> -{ >> - struct drm_device *dev = crtc->dev; >> - struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv = to_i915(dev); >> - struct intel_crtc *intel_crtc = to_intel_crtc(crtc); >> - int pipe = intel_crtc->pipe; >> - >> - intel_pre_disable_primary(crtc, to_intel_crtc_state(crtc->state)); >> + hsw_disable_ips(to_intel_crtc_state(crtc->state)); > BTW thinking about the lack of readout on BDW. In case the BIOS ever > enables IPS, I think we should sanitize ips_enabled to true on BDW. > Or maybe just have the redaout code always set ips_enabled=true on BDW? > That way the first modeset will try to turn it off regardless of whether it > was enabled or not. Yes, good idea. :) >> >> /* >> * Vblank time updates from the shadow to live plane control register >> @@ -5058,6 +5029,11 @@ static void intel_post_plane_update(struct intel_crtc_state *old_crtc_state) >> if (pipe_config->update_wm_post && pipe_config->base.active) >> intel_update_watermarks(crtc); >> >> + if (!old_crtc_state->ips_enabled || >> + needs_modeset(&old_crtc_state->base) || > Shoudldn't that be needs_modeset(new_crtc_state)? Yes, oops.. >> + pipe_config->update_pipe) > Why do we have to check that? In case we take over the hw state from bios.. If we default ips_enabled to true on BDW and read out on HSW again, then this check will make IPS work, regardless of bios setting.. >> + hsw_enable_ips(pipe_config); >> + >> if (old_pri_state) { >> struct intel_plane_state *primary_state = >> intel_atomic_get_new_plane_state(to_intel_atomic_state(old_state), >> @@ -5088,6 +5064,9 @@ static void intel_pre_plane_update(struct intel_crtc_state *old_crtc_state, >> struct intel_atomic_state *old_intel_state = >> to_intel_atomic_state(old_state); >> >> + if (needs_modeset(&pipe_config->base) || !pipe_config->ips_enabled) >> + hsw_disable_ips(old_crtc_state); >> + >> if (old_pri_state) { >> struct intel_plane_state *primary_state = >> intel_atomic_get_new_plane_state(old_intel_state, >> @@ -5096,10 +5075,13 @@ static void intel_pre_plane_update(struct intel_crtc_state *old_crtc_state, >> to_intel_plane_state(old_pri_state); >> >> intel_fbc_pre_update(crtc, pipe_config, primary_state); >> - >> - if (old_primary_state->base.visible && >> + /* >> + * Gen2 reports pipe underruns whenever all planes are disabled. >> + * So disable underrun reporting before all the planes get disabled. >> + */ >> + if (IS_GEN2(dev_priv) && old_primary_state->base.visible && >> (modeset || !primary_state->base.visible)) >> - intel_pre_disable_primary(&crtc->base, old_crtc_state); >> + intel_set_cpu_fifo_underrun_reporting(dev_priv, crtc->pipe, false); >> } >> >> /* >> @@ -6231,12 +6213,25 @@ static int ironlake_fdi_compute_config(struct intel_crtc *intel_crtc, >> static bool pipe_config_supports_ips(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv, >> struct intel_crtc_state *pipe_config) >> { >> + u8 visible_planes; >> + >> if (pipe_config->ips_force_disable) >> return false; >> >> if (pipe_config->pipe_bpp > 24) >> return false; >> >> + visible_planes = pipe_config->active_planes & ~BIT(PLANE_CURSOR); >> + >> + /* >> + * FIXME IPS should be fine as long as one plane is >> + * enabled, but in practice it seems to have problems >> + * when going from primary only to sprite only and vice >> + * versa. >> + */ >> + if (visible_planes != BIT(PLANE_PRIMARY)) >> + return false; > I think that should be '(active_planes & PRIMARY) == 0'. As in we don't > care what the other planes are doing, IPS just tracks the primary state > (for the time being). Oops, faultily assumed from the comment that IPS only worked with the primary plane or sprite plane, not both. I'll correct it. > What's missing from this patch is changing the cdclk vs. ips workaround > to not assume that cdclk can be increased to accomodate ips. Hm true, I missed that.. Will send a new version in a bit. >> + >> /* HSW can handle pixel rate up to cdclk? */ >> if (IS_HASWELL(dev_priv)) >> return true; >> @@ -6378,9 +6373,6 @@ static int intel_crtc_compute_config(struct intel_crtc *crtc, >> >> intel_crtc_compute_pixel_rate(pipe_config); >> >> - if (HAS_IPS(dev_priv)) >> - hsw_compute_ips_config(crtc, pipe_config); >> - >> if (pipe_config->has_pch_encoder) >> return ironlake_fdi_compute_config(crtc, pipe_config); >> >> @@ -10488,6 +10480,9 @@ static int intel_crtc_atomic_check(struct drm_crtc *crtc, >> pipe_config); >> } >> >> + if (HAS_IPS(dev_priv)) >> + hsw_compute_ips_config(intel_crtc, pipe_config); >> + >> return ret; >> } >> >> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_pipe_crc.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_pipe_crc.c >> index 61641d479b93..1f5cd572a7ff 100644 >> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_pipe_crc.c >> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_pipe_crc.c >> @@ -541,8 +541,6 @@ static void hsw_pipe_A_crc_wa(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv, >> * completely disable it. >> */ >> pipe_config->ips_force_disable = enable; >> - if (pipe_config->ips_enabled == enable) >> - pipe_config->base.connectors_changed = true; >> } >> >> if (IS_HASWELL(dev_priv)) { >> -- >> 2.15.0 >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Intel-gfx mailing list >> Intel-gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >> https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx _______________________________________________ Intel-gfx mailing list Intel-gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx