On Tue, Nov 07, 2017 at 06:40:08PM +0000, Ramalingam C wrote:
> From: "C, Ramalingam" <ramalingam.c@xxxxxxxxx>
>
> Existing debugfs entry i915_drrs_status is updated with crtc id and
> if PSR is cause for DRRS disabled state.
>
> [v2]: Dropped the module parameter details as ctl moved from module
> parameter to debugfs. [Rodrigo]
>
> Signed-off-by: C, Ramalingam <ramalingam.c@xxxxxxxxx>
> ---
> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_debugfs.c | 7 +++++--
> 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_debugfs.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_debugfs.c
> index 0c1501fe4c9f..6c2e8346b9a7 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_debugfs.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_debugfs.c
> @@ -3567,7 +3567,10 @@ static void drrs_status_per_crtc(struct seq_file *m,
>
> /* disable_drrs() will make drrs->dp NULL */
> if (!drrs->dp) {
> - seq_puts(m, "Idleness DRRS: Disabled");
> + seq_puts(m, "Idleness DRRS: Disabled\n");
> + if (dev_priv->psr.enabled)
> + seq_puts(m,
> + "\tAs PSR is enabled, DRRS is not enabled\n");
this seems good...
> mutex_unlock(&drrs->mutex);
> return;
> }
> @@ -3611,7 +3614,7 @@ static int i915_drrs_status(struct seq_file *m, void *unused)
> for_each_intel_crtc(dev, intel_crtc) {
> if (intel_crtc->base.state->active) {
> active_crtc_cnt++;
> - seq_printf(m, "\nCRTC %d: ", active_crtc_cnt);
> + seq_printf(m, "\nCRTC %d: ", intel_crtc->base.base.id);
this seems for a separated patch...
or at least missing an explanation why...
>
> drrs_status_per_crtc(m, dev, intel_crtc);
> }
> --
> 2.7.4
>
> _______________________________________________
> Intel-gfx mailing list
> Intel-gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
