On Thu, 16 Nov 2017, Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Thu, Nov 16, 2017 at 09:22:23AM +0000, Jani Nikula wrote: >> On Wed, 15 Nov 2017, Chris Wilson <chris@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> > Quoting David Weinehall (2017-11-15 18:01:41) >> >> On Tue, Nov 14, 2017 at 01:51:16PM +0000, Chris Wilson wrote: >> >> > WaEnablePooledEuFor2x6 only applies to preproduction models, unsupported >> >> > since commit 0102ba1fd8af ("drm/i915: Add early BXT sdv to the list of >> >> > preproduction machines"). >> >> > >> >> > Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> >> >> > Cc: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@xxxxxxxxx> >> >> >> >> Reviewed-by: David Weinehall <david.weinehall@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> >> > >> > Ta, hope your sdp is ok in the bin ;) >> > >> > Any volunteers for IS_GLK_REVID, IS_KBL_REVID ? >> > >> > I see one IS_SKL_REVID that can easily be removed. >> >> Need to know what the first shipped rev was. For example with bxt we >> apparently can't remove some of the rev checks. >> >> Seems like we should add more checks to intel_detect_preproduction_hw() >> too. > > With the IS_*_REVID in place I'd advocate to leave the workarounds around. > > I understand that codes get cleaner if we remove them from here, > but usually previous pre-prod workarounds are useful reference for > new platforms power-on... Perhaps for the gen-1, but not older. BR, Jani. > > Thanks, > Rodrigo. > >> >> BR, >> Jani. >> >> -- >> Jani Nikula, Intel Open Source Technology Center >> _______________________________________________ >> Intel-gfx mailing list >> Intel-gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >> https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx -- Jani Nikula, Intel Open Source Technology Center _______________________________________________ Intel-gfx mailing list Intel-gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx