Re: [PATCH v2 3/4] drm/i915: fix 64bit divide

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 13/11/17 18:44, Matthew Auld wrote:
On 13 November 2017 at 18:19, Lionel Landwerlin
<lionel.g.landwerlin@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
ERROR: "__udivdi3" [drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915.ko] undefined!
ERROR: "__divdi3" [drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915.ko] undefined!

We can also drop an if() as we divide by (value + 1) only if value is
not 0.

Fixes: dab9178333 ("drm/i915: expose command stream timestamp frequency to userspace")
Reported-by: Matthew Auld <matthew.auld@xxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Lionel Landwerlin <lionel.g.landwerlin@xxxxxxxxx>
---
  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_device_info.c | 7 +++----
  1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_device_info.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_device_info.c
index 78bf7374fbdd..992ae1bdfb3b 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_device_info.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_device_info.c
@@ -336,13 +336,12 @@ static u64 read_reference_ts_freq(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv)

         base_freq = ((ts_override & GEN9_TIMESTAMP_OVERRIDE_US_COUNTER_DIVIDER_MASK) >>
                      GEN9_TIMESTAMP_OVERRIDE_US_COUNTER_DIVIDER_SHIFT) + 1;
-       base_freq *= 1000000;
+       base_freq *= 1000000ULL;

         frac_freq = ((ts_override &
                       GEN9_TIMESTAMP_OVERRIDE_US_COUNTER_DENOMINATOR_MASK) >>
                      GEN9_TIMESTAMP_OVERRIDE_US_COUNTER_DENOMINATOR_SHIFT);
-       if (frac_freq != 0)
-               frac_freq = 1000000 / (frac_freq + 1);
+       frac_freq = div_u64(1000000ULL, frac_freq + 1);
s/div_u64/div64_u64/ ?

Oh right!


         return base_freq + frac_freq;
  }
@@ -360,7 +359,7 @@ static u64 read_timestamp_frequency(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv)
                  *      hclks." (through the “Clocking Configuration”
                  *      (“CLKCFG”) MCHBAR register)
                  */
-               return (dev_priv->rawclk_freq * 1000) / 16;
+               return div_u64(dev_priv->rawclk_freq * 1000ULL, 16);
Why do we need this?

It was just for consistency as we return a u64. I can drop it if you want.


         } else if (INTEL_GEN(dev_priv) <= 8) {
                 /* PRMs say:
                  *
--
2.15.0

_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx


_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx




[Index of Archives]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]
  Powered by Linux