On Sat, 11 Nov 2017 01:06:31 +0100, Sujaritha Sundaresan
<sujaritha.sundaresan@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Unifying the various seq_puts messages in debugfs to the simplest one for
feature support.
v2: Clarifying the commit message (Anusha)
v3: Re-factoring code as per review (Michal)
v4: Rebase
v5: Split from following patch
v6: Re-factoring code (Michal, Sagar)
Clarifying commit message (Sagar)
v7: Generalizing subject to drm/i915 (Sagar)
v8: Omitting DRRS seq_puts unification (Michal)
v9: Including the HAS_HUC condition (Michal)
Updating more functions with unified message (Sagar)
Suggested by : Michal Wajdeczko <michal.wajdeczko@xxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Sujaritha Sundaresan <sujaritha.sundaresan@xxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Daniele Ceraolo Spurio <daniele.ceraolospurio@xxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Michal Wajdeczko <michal.wajdeczko@xxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Oscar Mateo <oscar.mateo@xxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Sagar Arun Kamble <sagar.a.kamble@xxxxxxxxx>
---
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_debugfs.c | 53
+++++++++++++++++++++++++------------
1 file changed, 36 insertions(+), 17 deletions(-)
<snip>
@@ -2361,8 +2361,10 @@ static int i915_huc_load_status_info(struct
seq_file *m, void *data)
struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv = node_to_i915(m->private);
struct drm_printer p;
- if (!HAS_HUC_UCODE(dev_priv))
+ if (!HAS_HUC(dev_priv)) {
Hmm, HAS_HUC is not available yet, it will be introduced by patch 2/8
<snip>
@@ -2461,9 +2465,11 @@ static bool check_guc_submission(struct seq_file
*m)
if (!guc->execbuf_client) {
seq_printf(m, "GuC submission %s\n",
- HAS_GUC_SCHED(dev_priv) ?
- "disabled" :
- "not supported");
+ HAS_GUC(dev_priv) ?
+ "not supported" :
+ NEEDS_GUC_FW(dev_priv) ?
NEEDS_GUC_FW will also be introduced by patch 2/8
Michal
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
