On 10 November 2017 at 10:11, Chris Wilson <chris@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > Originally it was anticipated that timeouts would be a rare event, and > so merit a warning that the test was incomplete. However, for igt we > keep the timeout low, and hitting the timeout is intentional. It no > longer necessitates a warning, but to be expected. > > Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > Cc: Matthew Auld <matthew.auld@xxxxxxxxx> > Cc: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@xxxxxxxxx> > Cc: Joonas Lahtinen <joonas.lahtinen@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Reviewed-by: Matthew Auld <matthew.auld@xxxxxxxxx> _______________________________________________ Intel-gfx mailing list Intel-gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
