We no longer use intel_crtc->wm.active for watermarks any more,
which was incorrect. But this uncovered a bug in sanitize_watermarks(),
which meant that we wrote the correct watermarks, but the next
update would still use the wrong hw watermarks for calculating.
This caused all further updates to fail with -EINVAL and the
log would reveal an error like the one below:
[ 10.043902] [drm:ilk_validate_wm_level.part.8 [i915]] Sprite WM0 too large 56 (max 0)
[ 10.043960] [drm:ilk_validate_pipe_wm [i915]] LP0 watermark invalid
[ 10.044030] [drm:intel_crtc_atomic_check [i915]] No valid intermediate pipe watermarks are possible
Signed-off-by: Maarten Lankhorst <maarten.lankhorst@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Fixes: b6b178a77210 ("drm/i915: Calculate ironlake intermediate watermarks correctly, v2.")
Cc: stable@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx #v4.8+
---
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c | 2 ++
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c
index 84817ccc5305..17665ee06c9a 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c
@@ -14442,6 +14442,8 @@ static void sanitize_watermarks(struct drm_device *dev)
cs->wm.need_postvbl_update = true;
dev_priv->display.optimize_watermarks(intel_state, cs);
+
+ to_intel_crtc_state(crtc->state)->wm = cs->wm;
}
put_state:
--
2.15.0
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
