Re: [PATCH i-g-t 5/5] intel_gvtg_test: Handle system(3) return value.

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 




On 08/11/2017 12:19, Chris Wilson wrote:
Quoting Tvrtko Ursulin (2017-11-08 12:06:54)
From: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@xxxxxxxxx>

Avoid the build warning by checking the pkill either did not find
any guests or managed to send a signal to all of them.

Signed-off-by: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@xxxxxxxxx>
---
  tools/intel_gvtg_test.c | 4 +++-
  1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/tools/intel_gvtg_test.c b/tools/intel_gvtg_test.c
index 7a29fbdde7cd..8c3d10cbd97f 100644
--- a/tools/intel_gvtg_test.c
+++ b/tools/intel_gvtg_test.c
@@ -144,7 +144,9 @@ static void create_guest(void)
static void destroy_all_guest(void)
  {
-    system("pkill qemu");
+       int ret = system("pkill qemu");
+
+       igt_assert(ret == 0 || ret == 1);

igt_terminate_process("qemu");

Still wants the return checked.

Opted not to go for the helper because:

a) It would change the behaviour (exact match vs not) which I don't want to go into.

b) igt_terminate_process looks inconsistent in return codes between its two implementations.

Regards,

Tvrtko
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx




[Index of Archives]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]
  Powered by Linux