On Tue, Oct 03, 2017 at 01:57:13PM +0300, Arkadiusz Hiler wrote: > On Wed, Sep 27, 2017 at 03:34:19PM -0300, Gabriel Krisman Bertazi wrote: > > Two scenarios tested: > > - unaligned stride > > - Stride too small > > > > Signed-off-by: Gabriel Krisman Bertazi <krisman@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > > Fails on APL > https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/IGTPW_260/shard-apl2/igt@kms_ccs@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/IGTPW_260/shard-apl8/igt@kms_ccs@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > > Works just fine on KBL though > https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/IGTPW_260/shard-kbl1/igt@kms_ccs@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/IGTPW_260/shard-kbl1/igt@kms_ccs@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Looks like the test has the addfb2 vs. render_fb() order wrong. The bad stride could make render_fb/ccs() do somehting unexpected. -- Ville Syrjälä Intel OTC _______________________________________________ Intel-gfx mailing list Intel-gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
